Dred Scott v. Sandford1857
McLean dissented, with Curtis (§32): slavery exists only by force of local law, and freedom follows the free soil. Scott remained a slave; Black Americans could not be citizens; the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional.
One of the two dissents that armed the Republican answer to Taney (§24) — and, his critics noted, kept his presidential hopes alive.
Wayne concurred in Taney's (§24) opinion in full — and had moved in conference that the Court decide the broad questions. Scott remained a slave; Black Americans could not be citizens; the Missouri Compromise was void.
The escalation was substantially Wayne's doing: the narrow case became the catastrophic one at his urging.
Taney wrote the principal opinion. Americans of African descent, enslaved or free, were not citizens under the Constitution and could not sue in federal court; and Congress had no power to prohibit slavery in the territories, voiding the Missouri Compromise.
The most infamous decision in the Court's history — a judicial attempt to settle slavery that instead helped ignite the Civil War, and the case against which the Fourteenth Amendment's guarantee of birthright citizenship was written.
Catron concurred separately — and had privately urged President-elect Buchanan to pressure Grier (§31) to join the majority. The Missouri Compromise was void — for Catron, because it violated the terms of the Louisiana cession treaty and the equal rights of all states' citizens in the common territory.
The back-channel letters are the era's great judicial-ethics scandal: the decision was coordinated with the incoming president.
Daniel concurred — the most extreme proslavery opinion of the nine. Scott remained a slave; for Daniel, even the Northwest Ordinance's slavery ban had been unconstitutional.
The furthest edge of the decision: race, in Daniel's telling, placed Black Americans forever outside 'the family of nations.'
Originally assigned the opinion of the Court, Nelson filed his narrow draft as a concurrence after the majority went broad. Nelson's separate opinion would have decided the case narrowly: Missouri law governed Scott's status, and nothing more needed deciding.
The road not taken — had his opinion held the Court, Dred Scott would be a footnote instead of a catastrophe.
Grier concurred with Nelson (§29) and with Taney (§24) on the Compromise — after assuring President-elect Buchanan of the outcome by letter. Scott remained a slave; the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional.
The Pennsylvania vote that made the decision look national rather than sectional — procured by presidential pressure.
Curtis dissented, with McLean (§21), and resigned months later amid the feud with Taney (§24) over the opinion's revision. Free native-born Black men were citizens — and voters in five states — at the founding; the Missouri Compromise was valid.
The century's most celebrated dissent: the historical demolition of Taney's opinion that armed the Republican constitutional answer.
Campbell concurred. Congress lacked power under the Territories Clause to bar slavery from territory held for the common benefit of all the states.
The scholarly version of the southern position — states'-rights federalism applied to the territories.