Every Key Decision

The 265 cases without which the 116 justices could not be described — and the 42 that more than one of them claimed.

331 entries across 265 cases, 17822026. Every one links to a free full text. Vote splits and issue areas, where shown, are the Supreme Court Database’s.

Read this first

This is not a ranking. Every case here was chosen while writing a particular justice — one of the handful of decisions that explain why that justice is remembered at all. Turned around to face the cases, the set becomes something no ranking produces: 42 decisions are claimed by more than one justice, and on those you get several accounts of the same afternoon, written separately, from different seats on the bench.

The cases more than one justice is remembered for

42 of the 265. These entries were written independently, for different justices, and only meet here.

Dred Scott v. Sandford1857

60 U.S. 3937–2
Civil Rights9 justices

McLean dissented, with Curtis (§32): slavery exists only by force of local law, and freedom follows the free soil. Scott remained a slave; Black Americans could not be citizens; the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional.

One of the two dissents that armed the Republican answer to Taney (§24) — and, his critics noted, kept his presidential hopes alive.

Wayne concurred in Taney's (§24) opinion in full — and had moved in conference that the Court decide the broad questions. Scott remained a slave; Black Americans could not be citizens; the Missouri Compromise was void.

The escalation was substantially Wayne's doing: the narrow case became the catastrophic one at his urging.

Taney wrote the principal opinion. Americans of African descent, enslaved or free, were not citizens under the Constitution and could not sue in federal court; and Congress had no power to prohibit slavery in the territories, voiding the Missouri Compromise.

The most infamous decision in the Court's history — a judicial attempt to settle slavery that instead helped ignite the Civil War, and the case against which the Fourteenth Amendment's guarantee of birthright citizenship was written.

Catron concurred separately — and had privately urged President-elect Buchanan to pressure Grier (§31) to join the majority. The Missouri Compromise was void — for Catron, because it violated the terms of the Louisiana cession treaty and the equal rights of all states' citizens in the common territory.

The back-channel letters are the era's great judicial-ethics scandal: the decision was coordinated with the incoming president.

Daniel concurred — the most extreme proslavery opinion of the nine. Scott remained a slave; for Daniel, even the Northwest Ordinance's slavery ban had been unconstitutional.

The furthest edge of the decision: race, in Daniel's telling, placed Black Americans forever outside 'the family of nations.'

Originally assigned the opinion of the Court, Nelson filed his narrow draft as a concurrence after the majority went broad. Nelson's separate opinion would have decided the case narrowly: Missouri law governed Scott's status, and nothing more needed deciding.

The road not taken — had his opinion held the Court, Dred Scott would be a footnote instead of a catastrophe.

Grier concurred with Nelson (§29) and with Taney (§24) on the Compromise — after assuring President-elect Buchanan of the outcome by letter. Scott remained a slave; the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional.

The Pennsylvania vote that made the decision look national rather than sectional — procured by presidential pressure.

Curtis dissented, with McLean (§21), and resigned months later amid the feud with Taney (§24) over the opinion's revision. Free native-born Black men were citizens — and voters in five states — at the founding; the Missouri Compromise was valid.

The century's most celebrated dissent: the historical demolition of Taney's opinion that armed the Republican constitutional answer.

Campbell concurred. Congress lacked power under the Territories Clause to bar slavery from territory held for the common benefit of all the states.

The scholarly version of the southern position — states'-rights federalism applied to the territories.

Chisholm v. Georgia1793

2 U.S. 4194–1
Federalism5 justices
John Jay§14–1

Jay wrote one of the seriatim opinions for the majority — the only major constitutional opinion he ever authored — grounding sovereignty in the people: "the people are the sovereign of this country." A citizen of one state may sue another state in federal court; states do not enjoy sovereign immunity from such suits.

The Court's first great case — and its first great backlash. The decision was so unpopular that Congress and the states ratified the Eleventh Amendment to overturn it, the first time a constitutional amendment reversed the Court.

Cushing joined the majority with a characteristically plain, textual seriatim opinion. States may be sued by citizens of other states in federal court.

Overturned by the Eleventh Amendment — the Court's first great collision with popular politics.

James Wilson§44–1

Wilson's seriatim opinion was the majority's most theoretically ambitious — locating sovereignty in the people of the United States, not the states. A citizen of one state may sue another state in federal court.

The fullest early statement of popular sovereignty as constitutional doctrine, from its principal architect. Overturned by the Eleventh Amendment, but Wilson's theory of the Union outlived the holding.

Blair's seriatim opinion was the plainest and most textually grounded of the majority. A citizen of one state may sue another state in federal court.

An early model of constitutional textualism — decided against his own state's interest, and overturned by the Eleventh Amendment.

James Iredell§64–1 (Iredell dissenting)

The lone dissenter — arguing the Constitution did not clearly abrogate state sovereign immunity. The majority held that citizens of one state may sue another state in federal court.

Vindicated by the Eleventh Amendment two years later. The modern Court has repeatedly cited Iredell's dissent as correctly stating the original understanding — the first strict constructionist, and the first proven right by constitutional amendment.

Prize Cases1863

67 U.S. 6355–4
Miscellaneous5 justices

Wayne joined Grier's (§31) 5–4 majority. Lincoln's blockade of the South was lawful from the start; a state of war existed as a fact without a declaration.

The Georgia Unionist supplied a vote without which the legal basis of the Union war effort would have collapsed.

Catron joined Nelson's (§29) dissent. The minority would have held no legal state of war — and no lawful prizes — existed before Congress acted in July 1861.

Even a fierce Unionist balked at blockade-as-war before Congress spoke — Catron's legalism outrunning his politics.

Nelson wrote the dissent, joined by Taney (§24), Catron (§26), and Clifford (§34). The dissent would have held Lincoln's blockade unlawful before Congress recognized a state of war on July 13, 1861.

Four votes from holding the Union's early war measures illegal — the Court's closest wartime call.

Grier wrote the 5–4 majority. The President could lawfully blockade the South after Sumter without a declaration of war; war existed as a fact he was bound to meet.

The legal foundation of the Union war effort — 'a civil war is never solemnly declared.'

Clifford joined Nelson's (§29) dissent, with Taney (§24) and Catron (§26). The dissenters would have held the blockade unlawful until Congress recognized a state of war in July 1861.

The doughface Democrat's war, in judicial form.

Slaughter-House Cases1873

83 U.S. 365–4
Economic Activity5 justices

Campbell argued for the New Orleans butchers — as counsel, twelve years after resigning from the Court. The Fourteenth Amendment's Privileges or Immunities Clause was read narrowly, protecting only rights of national citizenship.

His losing 5–4 argument for a broad Fourteenth Amendment shaped the debate permanently; the ex-Confederate became the amendment's most expansive advocate.

Swayne wrote a separate dissent, alongside Field's (§38) and Bradley's (§41). The majority read the Privileges or Immunities Clause to protect only rights of national citizenship.

One of three dissents insisting the Fourteenth Amendment had actually changed the constitutional order.

Miller wrote the 5–4 majority over dissents by Field (§38), Bradley (§41), and Swayne (§35). The Fourteenth Amendment's Privileges or Immunities Clause protects only rights of national citizenship, narrowly conceived; Louisiana's slaughterhouse monopoly stood.

The decision that hollowed the amendment's central clause within five years of its ratification — the fork in the road of Reconstruction constitutionalism.

Field wrote a principal dissent from the Court's narrow reading of the clause. (Dissenting) The Fourteenth Amendment's Privileges or Immunities Clause protects the fundamental economic rights of national citizenship, including the right to pursue a lawful occupation.

Planted the seed of the substantive economic due process that would flower in the Lochner era.

Bradley dissented separately, alongside Field (§38) and Swayne (§35). The majority reduced the Privileges or Immunities Clause to rights of national citizenship.

His dissent's broad reading of the amendment was the road not taken — which Bradley himself later helped close.

The remaining 38 shared cases are marked in gold in the full list below.

Every case, Court by Court

Chronological within each Chief Justice’s tenure. Gold entries are the shared ones.

Before the Court

to 1789 · 2 cases

Blair sat on the court; the surviving evidence of exactly what each judge said is contested (the case was reported decades later from imperfect notes). Virginia's Court of Appeals asserted that courts could refuse to enforce legislative acts inconsistent with the constitution.

A direct state-court precursor to Marbury v. Madison, two decades early — though scholars caution that the record of Caton is murkier than the legend.

Cushing, as Chief Justice of Massachusetts, delivered the jury charge that abolished slavery in the state. Slavery is incompatible with the Massachusetts Constitution's declaration that "all men are born free and equal."

The first judicial abolition of slavery in American history. Rugg noted that the same "born free and equal" language appeared in Virginia's first constitution — and no Virginia court ever raised the question.

The Jay Court

1789–1795 · 10 cases

As a United States senator, Ellsworth was the principal draftsman. Created the federal district and circuit courts, fixed the size of the Supreme Court, and defined the jurisdiction of the federal judiciary — including the Section 25 power to review state-court judgments on questions of federal law.

The foundational statute of the federal court system, still the backbone of federal jurisdiction more than two centuries later.

Georgia v. Brailsford1792 / 1794

3 U.S. 11–0 unanimous
Due Process

Jay delivered the charge to the jury, telling them that while they should presume the judges were the best judges of law, "you have a right to take upon yourselves to judge of both, and to determine the law as well as the fact in controversy." After seriatim opinions on the injunction in 1792 (Jay wrote briefly), the case went to a jury trial before the full Supreme Court in 1794 — the only such trial in the Court's history.

The only jury trial ever conducted at the Supreme Court bar, and Jay's charge became a founding text in the long argument over jury nullification.

Georgia v. Brailsford1792

2 U.S. 4026–0 unanimous
Judicial Power

Johnson's lone written opinion as a justice — a procedural dissent. The Court granted an injunction concerning debts sequestered by Georgia during the Revolution.

The entirety of his Supreme Court paper trail: fourteen months, one dissent. His tenure is a case study in the early Court's structural dysfunction, not in jurisprudence.

Hayburn's Case1792

2 U.S. 4096–0 unanimous
Judicial Power

Wilson and his circuit colleagues declined to perform non-judicial duties — an early assertion of separation of powers. Circuit courts (with Wilson among the judges) refused to act as pension commissioners subject to executive revision.

A precursor of judicial independence doctrine: federal judges may not be assigned duties subject to review by the other branches.

Chisholm v. Georgia1793

2 U.S. 4194–1
Federalism5 justices
John Jay§14–1

Jay wrote one of the seriatim opinions for the majority — the only major constitutional opinion he ever authored — grounding sovereignty in the people: "the people are the sovereign of this country." A citizen of one state may sue another state in federal court; states do not enjoy sovereign immunity from such suits.

The Court's first great case — and its first great backlash. The decision was so unpopular that Congress and the states ratified the Eleventh Amendment to overturn it, the first time a constitutional amendment reversed the Court.

Cushing joined the majority with a characteristically plain, textual seriatim opinion. States may be sued by citizens of other states in federal court.

Overturned by the Eleventh Amendment — the Court's first great collision with popular politics.

James Wilson§44–1

Wilson's seriatim opinion was the majority's most theoretically ambitious — locating sovereignty in the people of the United States, not the states. A citizen of one state may sue another state in federal court.

The fullest early statement of popular sovereignty as constitutional doctrine, from its principal architect. Overturned by the Eleventh Amendment, but Wilson's theory of the Union outlived the holding.

Blair's seriatim opinion was the plainest and most textually grounded of the majority. A citizen of one state may sue another state in federal court.

An early model of constitutional textualism — decided against his own state's interest, and overturned by the Eleventh Amendment.

James Iredell§64–1 (Iredell dissenting)

The lone dissenter — arguing the Constitution did not clearly abrogate state sovereign immunity. The majority held that citizens of one state may sue another state in federal court.

Vindicated by the Eleventh Amendment two years later. The modern Court has repeatedly cited Iredell's dissent as correctly stating the original understanding — the first strict constructionist, and the first proven right by constitutional amendment.

Jay, writing for the justices, politely refused Jefferson's request. The Supreme Court declined to give President Washington's cabinet an advisory opinion on twenty-nine questions of neutrality law.

Established the case-or-controversy principle that federal courts do not issue advisory opinions — a foundation of the separation of powers that has held for over two centuries.

Glass v. Sloop Betsey1794

3 U.S. 66–0 unanimous
Judicial Power

Jay delivered the Court's unanimous decree. American admiralty courts — not French consuls sitting on American soil — have jurisdiction over prizes brought into U.S. ports.

A quiet but firm assertion of American judicial sovereignty during the Genet crisis: no foreign power would operate courts inside the United States.

United States v. Peters1795

3 U.S. 1215–0 unanimous
Judicial Power

One of the only decisions of Rutledge's brief August 1795 term as Chief Justice. The Court, under Chief Justice Rutledge, issued a prohibition against a federal district court exercising admiralty jurisdiction over a prize taken by a French privateer.

Rutledge's judicial record is almost entirely a record of absence: he resigned his associate seat before hearing a case, and his recess appointment as Chief lasted one term before the Senate rejected him. The significance is institutional — the first demonstration that the Senate's confirmation power is real.

Paterson's circuit charge is one of the era's fullest statements of judicial review before Marbury. A state statute inconsistent with the state constitution is void; property may not be taken without just compensation.

A cornerstone of pre-Marbury judicial review doctrine and an early articulation of constitutional property protections.

The Ellsworth Court

1796–1800 · 5 cases

Hylton v. United States1796

3 U.S. 1714–0 unanimous
Federal Taxation

Chase wrote one of the seriatim opinions sustaining the tax. Congress's tax on carriages is an excise, not a 'direct tax' requiring apportionment among the states.

The Court weighed the constitutionality of an act of Congress seven years before Marbury — judicial review in practice before it had a name.

Ware v. Hylton1796

3 U.S. 1995–0 unanimous
Federalism

Chase wrote the leading seriatim opinion. The 1783 Treaty of Paris overrides Virginia's wartime confiscation of debts owed to British creditors; a national treaty prevails over conflicting state law.

The founding statement of treaty supremacy — argued and lost by John Marshall (§13), in his only appearance as an advocate before the Court he would later lead.

Wiscart v. D'Auchy1796

3 U.S. 3215–1
Economic Activity

Ellsworth wrote for the Court. The Supreme Court's appellate jurisdiction and standard of review are defined by Congress; absent a statutory provision for reviewing facts, the Court is bound by the record below.

An early statement that the shape of federal appellate jurisdiction is Congress's to set — a principle of enduring importance.

Calder v. Bull1798

3 U.S. 3864–0 unanimous
Criminal Procedure2 justices

Iredell's separate opinion rejected "natural justice" as a ground for striking down legislation, insisting on clear constitutional text. The Ex Post Facto Clause applies to criminal, not civil, laws.

The founding era's clearest articulation of textual judicial restraint — the ancestor of modern textualism, five years before Marbury.

Chase wrote the lead seriatim opinion. The Constitution's ex post facto clauses reach only retroactive criminal laws, not civil legislation.

His declaration that 'the great first principles of the social compact' limit legislatures even without express text — and Iredell's (§6) positivist reply — opened a debate over natural law and judicial power that has never closed.

Bas v. Tingy1800

4 U.S. 376–0 unanimous
Economic Activity

Moore wrote a seriatim opinion — the only opinion of his Supreme Court tenure. France was an 'enemy' within the 1799 salvage act: the undeclared Quasi-War was a real war, though 'limited' and 'partial.'

Early authority that Congress may authorize a war without declaring one, still cited in war-powers debates.

The Marshall Court

1801–1835 · 24 cases

Marbury v. Madison1803

5 U.S. 1376–0 unanimous
Judicial Power
John Marshall§134–0

Marshall wrote the opinion — while declining to issue the writ, avoiding a confrontation he could not win. The Court has the power to declare acts of Congress unconstitutional.

Judicial review. The single most important decision in the Court's history: "It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is."

Stuart v. Laird1803

5 U.S. 2994–0 unanimous
Judicial Power

Paterson wrote for the Court, six days after Marbury. Upheld Congress's repeal of the Judiciary Act of 1801 and the justices' circuit-riding duties.

The quiet companion to Marbury — the Court's strategic retreat that preserved its independence during the Jeffersonian assault on the judiciary.

Livingston, then a New York judge, dissented — he would have awarded the fox to the pursuing huntsman. Mere pursuit gives no property right in a wild animal; capture or mortal wounding does.

The first-possession chestnut that has opened Anglo-American property courses for two centuries; the majority's rule won, but Livingston's wit is why students remember the case.

Fletcher v. Peck1810

10 U.S. 874–1
Economic Activity

Johnson concurred separately, resting on 'the reason and nature of things' rather than the Contract Clause — and voicing suspicion that the suit was feigned. Georgia could not revoke the corrupt Yazoo land grants once title had passed to innocent purchasers.

The first display of Johnson's independence in a landmark: agreeing with Marshall's (§13) result while refusing his reasoning.

Mima Queen v. Hepburn1813

11 U.S. 2905–1
Civil Rights

Duvall dissented alone from Marshall's (§13) opinion. Hearsay evidence is inadmissible to prove a freedom-suit petitioner's descent from a free woman; the Queen family remained enslaved.

'It will be universally admitted that the right to freedom is more important than the right of property' — the lone dissent that redeems an otherwise silent tenure.

Martin v. Hunter's Lessee1816

14 U.S. 3046–0 unanimous
Judicial Power

Story wrote for the Court. The Supreme Court has constitutional authority to review and reverse the decisions of state courts on questions of federal law.

Secured federal judicial supremacy over the states — a foundation stone of national union and of the Court's power.

Preston v. Browder1816

14 U.S. 1157–0 unanimous
Economic Activity

Todd wrote for the Court — his first opinion, nine years after joining it. A land entry made within territory secured to the Cherokee by treaty was void under North Carolina's own entry laws and conveyed no title.

Western land law was nearly Todd's whole judicial output, and this was its opening statement: settlers could not claim what treaties had reserved.

McCulloch v. Maryland1819

17 U.S. 3166–0 unanimous
Federalism
John Marshall§137–0

Marshall wrote for a unanimous Court. Congress has implied powers under the Necessary and Proper Clause; states cannot tax federal instrumentalities.

"We must never forget that it is a constitution we are expounding." The foundation of implied federal power and of federal supremacy.

The Josefa Segunda1820

18 U.S. 3387–0 unanimous
Due Process

Livingston wrote for the Court. A slave ship brought into New Orleans was forfeit under the 1807 act barring the slave trade; a plea of distress did not excuse the voyage.

One of the early enforcement teeth of the federal slave-trade ban.

United States v. Smith1820

18 U.S. 1536–1
Criminal Procedure

Livingston dissented alone: a capital crime, he insisted, must be defined by Congress itself. Congress may punish piracy 'as defined by the law of nations' without spelling out the definition in the statute.

A lonely early statement of legislative precision in capital cases — 'in a case affecting life, no apology can be necessary for expressing my dissent.'

Anderson v. Dunn1821

19 U.S. 2046–0 unanimous
Economic Activity

Johnson wrote for the Court. The House of Representatives has an implied power to punish non-members for contempt, though imprisonment ends with adjournment.

Still the foundation of Congress's contempt power two centuries on.

Watts v. Lindsey's Heirs1822

20 U.S. 1587–0 unanimous
Private Action

Todd wrote for the Court. A Virginia military-warrant entry too vague for a later locator to find was void; in equity a claimant recovers on the strength of his own title.

One of the precision rules that brought order to the chaos of overlapping frontier claims.

Washington wrote the opinion for the circuit court in Pennsylvania. Article IV's Privileges and Immunities Clause protects a core of fundamental rights of citizenship — though New Jersey could still reserve its oyster fisheries to its own citizens.

His enumeration of 'fundamental' privileges became the most-quoted gloss on the clause, central to the framing debates of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Johnson wrote the circuit opinion — though the Judiciary Act left him unable to grant the sailor habeas relief. South Carolina's Negro Seamen Act, which jailed free Black sailors in Charleston harbor, was 'altogether irreconcilable' with the federal commerce power and treaty obligations.

An act of judicial courage delivered in Charleston itself; the state defied the ruling, rehearsing the nullification argument of the decade to come.

Green v. Biddle1823

21 U.S. 14–1
Economic Activity

Washington wrote for the Court on rehearing. Kentucky's occupying-claimant laws violated the Virginia–Kentucky Compact of 1789, which the Contract Clause protects.

Extended the Contract Clause to interstate compacts — and set off years of Kentucky fury at the Court that shadowed Todd (§16) and Trimble (§20) at home.

Gibbons v. Ogden1824

22 U.S. 15–0 unanimous
Economic Activity2 justices
John Marshall§136–0

Marshall wrote the opinion, striking down New York's steamboat monopoly. Congress's commerce power reaches all commercial intercourse among the states.

The charter of the national economy — the commerce power that the modern regulatory state stands on.

Johnson concurred, arguing the commerce power is exclusive to Congress — broader ground than Marshall chose. Federal law prevailed over New York's steamboat monopoly; commerce among the states belongs to Congress to regulate.

Out-nationalized Marshall in the great commerce case; Johnson's exclusivity reasoning still echoes in dormant-commerce doctrine.

Riggs v. Tayloe1824

22 U.S. 4836–0 unanimous
Private Action

Todd wrote for the Court. The contents of a lost or accidentally destroyed instrument may be proved by secondary evidence once its absence is honestly accounted for.

Still-good black-letter evidence law — quiet proof that Todd's craftsmanship outran his fame.

Brown v. Maryland1827

25 U.S. 4196–1
Economic Activity

Thompson dissented alone. Maryland's license tax on importers fell as a duty on imports; goods in their 'original package' remain beyond state taxation.

His skepticism of the original-package doctrine anticipated the states'-rights commercial turn of the Taney (§24) years.

Ogden v. Saunders1827

25 U.S. 2134–3
Civil Rights3 justices

Washington wrote the lead opinion of the four-justice seriatim majority. A state insolvency law that applies only to contracts made after its enactment does not impair the obligation of contracts.

The only constitutional case John Marshall (§13) ever lost on his own Court — and Washington's one great step out of his chief's shadow.

Thompson wrote one of the four majority seriatim opinions. A state insolvency law operating only on contracts made after its passage does not impair the obligation of contracts.

Part of the majority that handed Marshall (§13) his only constitutional dissent.

Trimble wrote one of the four seriatim opinions for the divided majority — his lone constitutional opinion. A state insolvency law operating only on future contracts is consistent with the Contract Clause.

The case that drew John Marshall's (§13) only constitutional dissent; Trimble's opinion helped make the prospective/retrospective line stick.

The Antelope1827

25 U.S. 5467–0 unanimous
Civil Rights

Trimble wrote for the Court. In the litigation's final decree, the surviving Africans not proven Spanish property were delivered to the United States — and freedom — while those adjudged Spanish property went to the claimants.

Closed the Court's most anguished slave-trade case; most of the survivors were resettled in Liberia.

Le Grand v. Darnall1829

27 U.S. 6646–0 unanimous
Civil Rights

Duvall wrote for the Court. A master's bequest of property to his slave works the slave's freedom by necessary implication.

Freed Nicholas Darnall — and stated a manumission principle that state courts drew on for decades.

Cherokee Nation v. Georgia1831

30 U.S. 14–2
Civil Rights2 justices

Thompson dissented, joined by Story (§18): the Cherokee were a sovereign foreign state entitled to sue and to an injunction. The Cherokee Nation was held not a 'foreign state' entitled to invoke the Court's original jurisdiction against Georgia.

Marshall (§13) encouraged the dissent's publication; a year later its reasoning became the law in Worcester v. Georgia.

Baldwin concurred on the harshest ground: 'There is no plaintiff in this suit' — no Cherokee sovereignty at all. The Cherokee Nation's suit against Georgia was dismissed; the tribe was held not a foreign state able to sue.

The extreme pole of the Court's Indian-law spectrum, against Marshall's (§13) 'domestic dependent nations' and Thompson's (§19) dissent.

United States v. Arredondo1832

31 U.S. 6915–1
Economic Activity

Baldwin wrote for the Court. Spanish land grants made in Florida before the 1819 cession are property rights the treaty obliges the United States to respect.

His most substantial majority — the foundation of Florida land titles.

Wheaton v. Peters1834

33 U.S. 5914–2
Economic Activity

McLean wrote for the Court. There is no perpetual common-law copyright in published works; copyright in America is a creature of federal statute and its formalities.

The foundation of American copyright law — fittingly, a fight between two of the Court's own reporters.

The Taney Court

1836–1864 · 22 cases
Economic Activity

Taney wrote for the Court in his first major opinion as Chief Justice. A legislative charter grants only what it expressly states; ambiguous grants are construed against private monopoly and in favor of the public interest.

A decisive turn away from Marshall's protection of vested corporate rights toward public power and economic competition — a foundational case in American property and corporate law.

New York v. Miln1837

36 U.S. 1026–1
Economic Activity

Barbour wrote for the Court. New York could require masters of arriving ships to report their passengers: a police-power regulation of persons, not a regulation of commerce.

The Taney Court's opening statement on state power — 'persons are not the subject of commerce' — later repudiated by the Passenger Cases (1849) and Henderson v. New York (1876).

Judicial Power

Thompson wrote for the Court. A federal court may issue mandamus compelling the Postmaster General to perform a purely ministerial duty.

The executive is not beyond judicial command — a cornerstone later generations reached for, from the steel-seizure case to the subpoena fights.

Bank of Augusta v. Earle1839

38 U.S. 5198–1
Economic Activity

McKinley was the lone dissenter, adhering to his own circuit ruling that Taney's (§24) majority reversed. A corporation chartered in one state may contract and do business in another under interstate comity, unless the host state expressly forbids it.

The charter of interstate corporate enterprise in America — with McKinley cast as the last defender of state economic sovereignty.

Groves v. Slaughter1841

40 U.S. 4495–2
Civil Rights2 justices

McLean concurred separately: enslaved people were persons, not articles of commerce, and power over slavery was local. Mississippi's constitutional ban on importing slaves for sale was not self-executing, so the notes at issue were valid.

The Court's first open airing of the collision between the commerce power and slavery, with McLean and Baldwin (§22) staking the poles.

Baldwin concurred: the commerce power is exclusively federal, and enslaved people were property in interstate commerce that states could not exclude. Mississippi's constitutional ban on slave importation was not self-executing.

The proslavery pole of the Court's first commerce-and-slavery debate — McLean's (§21) mirror image.

United States v. The Amistad1841

40 U.S. 5188–0 unanimous
Civil Rights

Story wrote for the Court. Africans who seized the slave ship Amistad had been illegally enslaved and were free persons entitled to return home.

A landmark antislavery victory affirming that the illegal international slave trade could confer no legal title.

Prigg v. Pennsylvania1842

41 U.S. 5398–1
Civil Rights2 justices

Story wrote for the Court. The federal Fugitive Slave Act is constitutional and supreme; states may not interpose their own laws to protect alleged fugitives.

A pro-slavery ruling that nationalized fugitive-slave enforcement — though Story added that states need not assist it, a distinction the North seized upon.

McLean was the lone dissenter. Federal power over fugitive-slave rendition is exclusive; Pennsylvania's personal-liberty law was void.

Alone among nine, he defended a state's power to shield its free Black residents from kidnapping.

Swift v. Tyson1842

41 U.S. 19–0 unanimous
Federalism

Story wrote for the Court. In commercial cases federal courts may apply a 'general' common law rather than the decisions of the state courts.

Governed the federal courts for nearly a century until overruled by Erie Railroad v. Tompkins (1938, Brandeis §67).

Pollard v. Hagan1845

44 U.S. 2127–0 unanimous
Economic Activity

McKinley wrote for the Court. New states enter the Union on an equal footing with the original thirteen and take sovereign title to lands beneath their navigable waters.

The equal-footing doctrine — his one enduring majority, still the law of submerged lands.

Jones v. Van Zandt1847

46 U.S. 2159–0 unanimous
Civil Rights

Woodbury wrote for a unanimous Court, rejecting Salmon P. Chase's (§39) antislavery argument. The Fugitive Slave Act of 1793 was constitutional; an Ohio abolitionist was liable for harboring fugitives.

Slavery as one of the Constitution's 'sacred compromises' — the judicial settlement Uncle Tom's Cabin answered; Van Zandt became Stowe's Van Trompe.

License Cases1847

46 U.S. 5049–0 unanimous
Economic Activity

Catron wrote two of the separate opinions. State licensing laws restricting liquor sales in Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and New Hampshire were upheld; six justices wrote seriatim with no opinion of the Court.

The muddled middle of the Taney Court's commerce doctrine — awaiting the synthesis Curtis (§32) would supply in Cooley.

West River Bridge Co. v. Dix1848

47 U.S. 5077–1
Due Process

Daniel wrote for the Court. A state's eminent domain power can take a chartered corporate franchise; compensation, not the Contract Clause, is the owner's protection.

The great counterweight to Dartmouth College: charters are property, and property yields to the sovereign on payment.

Luther v. Borden1849

48 U.S. 15–1
Judicial Power

Woodbury agreed on the political question but dissented on martial law's reach. Which of Rhode Island's rival governments was legitimate is a political question for Congress, not the courts.

His partial dissent drew an early line against emergency power over individual rights.

Economic Activity

Daniel dissented alone, holding to the English tidewater rule. Federal admiralty jurisdiction extends to the Great Lakes and navigable inland waters, not merely tidewater.

Taney's (§24) most nationalist opinion, with Daniel as the last agrarian holdout against commercial reality.

Grier presided with Judge Kane and charged the jury against constructive treason. Armed resistance to the Fugitive Slave Act at Christiana was riot or murder at most — not treason, which requires actually levying war.

The jury acquitted in minutes; the government abandoned some forty treason indictments, and constructive treason was finished in America.

Cooley v. Board of Wardens1852

53 U.S. 2996–2
Economic Activity

Curtis wrote for the Court. Commerce subjects national in character demand exclusive congressional regulation; local subjects, like harbor pilotage, admit state regulation until Congress acts.

'Selective exclusiveness' — the foundation on which dormant-commerce doctrine still rests.

Private Action

Daniel dissented, denying that a corporation could ever be a 'citizen.' A corporation's shareholders are presumed citizens of the chartering state, preserving corporate access to federal diversity jurisdiction.

The purest statement of his lifelong war on corporate access to the federal courts.

Dodge v. Woolsey1856

59 U.S. 3316–3
Economic Activity2 justices

Wayne wrote for the Court; Campbell (§33), Catron (§26), and Daniel (§28) dissented. Ohio's 1852 bank-tax law impaired the tax cap in the bank's 1845 charter, violating the Contract Clause.

A high-water mark of Contract Clause protection for corporate charters — and the case where Campbell issued his great anti-corporate warning.

Campbell dissented, with Catron (§26) and Daniel (§28), against constitutionalizing corporate privilege. The Contract Clause barred Ohio from taxing a bank contrary to its charter's tax cap.

His warning of a corporate 'caste' beyond state control reads like a preview of the Gilded Age battles to come.

Dred Scott v. Sandford1857

60 U.S. 3937–2
Civil Rights9 justices

McLean dissented, with Curtis (§32): slavery exists only by force of local law, and freedom follows the free soil. Scott remained a slave; Black Americans could not be citizens; the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional.

One of the two dissents that armed the Republican answer to Taney (§24) — and, his critics noted, kept his presidential hopes alive.

Wayne concurred in Taney's (§24) opinion in full — and had moved in conference that the Court decide the broad questions. Scott remained a slave; Black Americans could not be citizens; the Missouri Compromise was void.

The escalation was substantially Wayne's doing: the narrow case became the catastrophic one at his urging.

Taney wrote the principal opinion. Americans of African descent, enslaved or free, were not citizens under the Constitution and could not sue in federal court; and Congress had no power to prohibit slavery in the territories, voiding the Missouri Compromise.

The most infamous decision in the Court's history — a judicial attempt to settle slavery that instead helped ignite the Civil War, and the case against which the Fourteenth Amendment's guarantee of birthright citizenship was written.

Catron concurred separately — and had privately urged President-elect Buchanan to pressure Grier (§31) to join the majority. The Missouri Compromise was void — for Catron, because it violated the terms of the Louisiana cession treaty and the equal rights of all states' citizens in the common territory.

The back-channel letters are the era's great judicial-ethics scandal: the decision was coordinated with the incoming president.

Daniel concurred — the most extreme proslavery opinion of the nine. Scott remained a slave; for Daniel, even the Northwest Ordinance's slavery ban had been unconstitutional.

The furthest edge of the decision: race, in Daniel's telling, placed Black Americans forever outside 'the family of nations.'

Originally assigned the opinion of the Court, Nelson filed his narrow draft as a concurrence after the majority went broad. Nelson's separate opinion would have decided the case narrowly: Missouri law governed Scott's status, and nothing more needed deciding.

The road not taken — had his opinion held the Court, Dred Scott would be a footnote instead of a catastrophe.

Grier concurred with Nelson (§29) and with Taney (§24) on the Compromise — after assuring President-elect Buchanan of the outcome by letter. Scott remained a slave; the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional.

The Pennsylvania vote that made the decision look national rather than sectional — procured by presidential pressure.

Curtis dissented, with McLean (§21), and resigned months later amid the feud with Taney (§24) over the opinion's revision. Free native-born Black men were citizens — and voters in five states — at the founding; the Missouri Compromise was valid.

The century's most celebrated dissent: the historical demolition of Taney's opinion that armed the Republican constitutional answer.

Campbell concurred. Congress lacked power under the Territories Clause to bar slavery from territory held for the common benefit of all the states.

The scholarly version of the southern position — states'-rights federalism applied to the territories.

Ableman v. Booth1859

62 U.S. 5069–0 unanimous
Federalism

Taney wrote for a unanimous Court. State courts have no power to interfere with the federal courts or to free, on habeas corpus, a prisoner held under federal authority — here an abolitionist jailed under the Fugitive Slave Act.

A forceful assertion of federal judicial supremacy over the states — ironically deployed to enforce the Fugitive Slave Act.

Prize Cases1863

67 U.S. 6355–4
Miscellaneous5 justices

Wayne joined Grier's (§31) 5–4 majority. Lincoln's blockade of the South was lawful from the start; a state of war existed as a fact without a declaration.

The Georgia Unionist supplied a vote without which the legal basis of the Union war effort would have collapsed.

Catron joined Nelson's (§29) dissent. The minority would have held no legal state of war — and no lawful prizes — existed before Congress acted in July 1861.

Even a fierce Unionist balked at blockade-as-war before Congress spoke — Catron's legalism outrunning his politics.

Nelson wrote the dissent, joined by Taney (§24), Catron (§26), and Clifford (§34). The dissent would have held Lincoln's blockade unlawful before Congress recognized a state of war on July 13, 1861.

Four votes from holding the Union's early war measures illegal — the Court's closest wartime call.

Grier wrote the 5–4 majority. The President could lawfully blockade the South after Sumter without a declaration of war; war existed as a fact he was bound to meet.

The legal foundation of the Union war effort — 'a civil war is never solemnly declared.'

Clifford joined Nelson's (§29) dissent, with Taney (§24) and Catron (§26). The dissenters would have held the blockade unlawful until Congress recognized a state of war in July 1861.

The doughface Democrat's war, in judicial form.

Gelpcke v. City of Dubuque1864

68 U.S. 1758–1
Private Action

Swayne wrote for the Court; Miller (§36) dissented. Municipal bonds valid under the state-court decisions in force when issued remain enforceable despite the state court's later reversal of doctrine.

'We shall never immolate truth, justice, and the law…' — the era's great bondholder-protection case and an early federal check on state judicial flip-flops.

The Chase Court

1864–1873 · 11 cases

Ex parte Milligan1866

71 U.S. 29–0 unanimous
Criminal Procedure

Davis wrote for the Court; Chase (§39), with Wayne (§23), Swayne (§35), and Miller (§36), would have allowed Congress to authorize such tribunals. Military commissions may not try civilians where the civil courts are open and functioning.

'A law for rulers and people, equally in war and in peace' — the great charter of civilian supremacy, cited in every wartime civil-liberties fight since.

Ex parte Garland1867

71 U.S. 3335–4
First Amendment

Wayne joined Field's (§38) five-justice majority, as in Cummings v. Missouri. The federal test oath barring former Confederates from law practice was an unconstitutional bill of attainder and ex post facto law.

The wartime Unionist drew his line at punitive Reconstruction.

Mississippi v. Johnson1867

71 U.S. 4759–0 unanimous
Miscellaneous

Chase wrote for the Court. A federal court has no jurisdiction to enjoin the President from carrying out his official duties, including enforcing the Reconstruction Acts.

An early and enduring statement of the separation of powers and the limits of judicial control over the executive.

Texas v. White1869

74 U.S. 7007–1
Judicial Power

Chase wrote for the Court. The United States is 'an indestructible Union, composed of indestructible States'; the ordinances by which the Confederate states purported to secede were legally void.

The definitive judicial rejection of secession and a foundational statement on the permanence of the Union.

Hepburn v. Griswold1870

75 U.S. 6034–3
Economic Activity

Chase wrote the opinion striking down the paper-money system he had helped create as Treasury secretary. The Legal Tender Acts making paper 'greenbacks' legal tender for pre-existing debts were unconstitutional.

A rare instance of a Chief Justice repudiating his own handiwork; reversed one year later in the Legal Tender Cases (1871) after the Court's membership grew.

Collector v. Day1871

78 U.S. 1137–1
Federalism

Nelson wrote for the Court. Congress cannot tax the salary of a state judicial officer.

The cornerstone of intergovernmental tax immunity — good law for nearly seventy years until Graves v. New York (1939).

Knox v. Lee1871

79 U.S. 4575–4
Economic Activity2 justicesalso called Knox v. Lee (Legal Tender Cases)

Clifford dissented at length, adhering to the hard-money holding of Hepburn v. Griswold he had joined the year before. The Legal Tender Acts were constitutional; greenbacks could discharge pre-existing debts.

His monument to Jacksonian hard money, written as the world moved on.

Strong wrote the 5–4 majority overruling Hepburn v. Griswold. The Legal Tender Acts were constitutional; greenbacks could discharge prior and subsequent debts.

The reversal that saved the Union's paper currency — delivered by the two justices appointed the day Hepburn came down.

Woods wrote the circuit opinion sustaining an Enforcement Act indictment for Klan-style violence. The rights secured by the first eight amendments are privileges of national citizenship that Congress may protect — even against private conspiracies.

The high-water mark of Fourteenth Amendment interpretation in the nineteenth century — still quoted in incorporation debates.

Bradwell v. Illinois1873

83 U.S. 1308–1
Civil Rights

Bradley concurred, joined by Swayne (§35) and Field (§38): woman's 'paramount destiny' is 'the noble and benign offices of wife and mother.' Admission to the bar is not a privilege of national citizenship; Illinois could refuse Myra Bradwell a law license.

The most-quoted statement of separate-spheres constitutionalism — the concurrence modern equal-protection law defines itself against.

Slaughter-House Cases1873

83 U.S. 365–4
Economic Activity5 justices

Campbell argued for the New Orleans butchers — as counsel, twelve years after resigning from the Court. The Fourteenth Amendment's Privileges or Immunities Clause was read narrowly, protecting only rights of national citizenship.

His losing 5–4 argument for a broad Fourteenth Amendment shaped the debate permanently; the ex-Confederate became the amendment's most expansive advocate.

Swayne wrote a separate dissent, alongside Field's (§38) and Bradley's (§41). The majority read the Privileges or Immunities Clause to protect only rights of national citizenship.

One of three dissents insisting the Fourteenth Amendment had actually changed the constitutional order.

Miller wrote the 5–4 majority over dissents by Field (§38), Bradley (§41), and Swayne (§35). The Fourteenth Amendment's Privileges or Immunities Clause protects only rights of national citizenship, narrowly conceived; Louisiana's slaughterhouse monopoly stood.

The decision that hollowed the amendment's central clause within five years of its ratification — the fork in the road of Reconstruction constitutionalism.

Field wrote a principal dissent from the Court's narrow reading of the clause. (Dissenting) The Fourteenth Amendment's Privileges or Immunities Clause protects the fundamental economic rights of national citizenship, including the right to pursue a lawful occupation.

Planted the seed of the substantive economic due process that would flower in the Lochner era.

Bradley dissented separately, alongside Field (§38) and Swayne (§35). The majority reduced the Privileges or Immunities Clause to rights of national citizenship.

His dissent's broad reading of the amendment was the road not taken — which Bradley himself later helped close.

Hunt presided as circuit justice, fined her $100, and declined to imprison her — blocking any appeal. Anthony was guilty of unlawful voting; Hunt directed the jury's verdict and refused to poll it.

The most notorious trial of the suffrage era: Anthony's courtroom speech became a founding text of the movement, and Hunt its foil.

The Waite Court

1874–1888 · 19 cases

Loan Association v. Topeka1874

87 U.S. 6558–1
Economic Activity2 justices

Clifford was the lone dissenter: courts may enforce only written constitutional limits, not unwritten ones. Taxation must serve a public purpose; municipal bonds issued to subsidize a private ironworks were void.

A positivist objection to judge-made limits that reads, ironically, like a preview of the Lochner debates.

Miller wrote for the Court; Clifford (§34) dissented alone. Taxation must serve a public purpose; municipal bonds issued to subsidize a private manufacturer were void.

The public-purpose doctrine — judicial limits on the fiscal favors of the subsidy age.

United States v. Cruikshank1876

92 U.S. 5428–1
Federalism

Waite wrote for the Court. The Fourteenth Amendment restrains only state action, not private violence; the federal charges against the perpetrators of the Colfax Massacre could not stand.

Crippled federal enforcement of Black civil rights and helped usher in the era of racial terror and Jim Crow.

United States v. Reese1876

92 U.S. 2149–0 unanimous
Private Action

Hunt was the lone dissenter on the constitutional merits. The Enforcement Act's voting-protection sections exceeded the Fifteenth Amendment's warrant.

As the Court began dismantling Reconstruction's voting protections, the machine politician from Utica was the one justice who objected.

Munn v. Illinois1877

94 U.S. 1137–2
Economic Activity2 justices

Field dissented from Chief Justice Waite's (§43) majority upholding rate regulation. (Dissenting) A state may not fix the rates of a private business; doing so takes property without due process of law.

An early and influential argument for judicial protection of economic liberty against regulation.

Waite wrote for the Court. A state may regulate the rates of private businesses 'affected with a public interest,' such as grain elevators.

Established the constitutional basis for public regulation of business — a cornerstone of the modern regulatory state.

Pennoyer v. Neff1878

95 U.S. 7148–1
Due Process

Field wrote for the Court. A state court cannot enter a binding personal judgment against a defendant outside its borders who was not served within the state.

The foundational decision on personal jurisdiction, still taught to every first-year law student.

Reynolds v. United States1878

98 U.S. 1459–0 unanimous
First Amendment

Waite wrote for a unanimous Court. The Free Exercise Clause protects religious belief but not conduct; a religious duty is no defense to the federal ban on polygamy.

The first major free-exercise decision, and the origin of the belief-conduct distinction that still shapes religious-liberty law.

Strauder v. West Virginia1880

100 U.S. 3037–2
Civil Rights

Strong wrote for the Court, as in the companion Ex parte Virginia. A statute excluding Black citizens from jury service violates the Equal Protection Clause.

The strongest equal-protection holdings of the nineteenth century — a floor that survived even the Jim Crow Court, in principle if rarely in practice.

Springer v. United States1881

102 U.S. 5867–0 unanimous
Federal Taxation

Swayne wrote for a unanimous Court. The Civil War income tax was not a 'direct tax' requiring apportionment; direct taxes are capitations and taxes on land.

The income-tax precedent Pollock overturned fourteen years later — and the Sixteenth Amendment restored.

Civil Rights Cases1883

109 U.S. 38–1
Civil Rights2 justices

Bradley wrote the majority; Harlan (§44) dissented alone. The Civil Rights Act of 1875 was unconstitutional; the Fourteenth Amendment reaches state action only.

Ended federal protection against private segregation for eighty years — the constitutional foundation on which Jim Crow was built.

Harlan dissented alone from the Court's invalidation of the Civil Rights Act of 1875. (Dissenting) Congress may ban racial discrimination in inns, theaters, and public conveyances under the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments.

Anticipated by eighty years the reasoning of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and its constitutional defense.

United States v. Harris1883

106 U.S. 6298–1
Civil Rights

Woods wrote for the Court. The Ku Klux Act's criminal-conspiracy section was unconstitutional; the Fourteenth Amendment does not reach private violence.

The author of Hall dismantled Hall — federal protection against Klan terror ended by the judge who had once supplied it.

Elk v. Wilkins1884

112 U.S. 947–2
Civil Rights

Gray wrote for the Court; Harlan (§44) dissented, joined by Woods (§45). A Native American born into a tribe is not 'subject to the jurisdiction' of the United States and gains no birthright citizenship.

The exclusionary reading of the Citizenship Clause — not undone for Native Americans until the Indian Citizenship Act of 1924.

Ex parte Yarbrough1884

110 U.S. 6519–0 unanimous
Civil Rights

Miller wrote for a unanimous Court. Congress may punish private violence against Black voters in federal elections.

The rare Gilded Age victory for federal enforcement — the Klan-era precedent voting-rights lawyers reached back to for a century.

Hurtado v. California1884

110 U.S. 5167–1
Criminal Procedure

Matthews wrote for the Court; Harlan (§44) dissented alone. Due process does not require states to charge felonies by grand-jury indictment.

Due process as evolving fundamental fairness — the framework, and the Harlan counter-position, that structured the incorporation debate into the 1960s.

Juilliard v. Greenman1884

110 U.S. 4218–1
Private Action

Gray wrote for the Court; Field (§38) dissented alone. Congress may make Treasury notes legal tender in peacetime, as an incident of the borrowing and sovereign powers.

Closed the legal-tender wars for good — paper money as a permanent constitutional fact.

Boyd v. United States1886

116 U.S. 6169–0 unanimous
Criminal Procedure

Bradley wrote the opinion. Compelling production of private papers to prove a charge violates the Fourth and Fifth Amendments.

The fountainhead of modern search-and-seizure and self-incrimination doctrine.

Presser v. Illinois1886

116 U.S. 2529–0 unanimous
First Amendment

Woods wrote for the Court. The Second Amendment limits only the federal government; states may ban private armed parades.

The nineteenth-century baseline of Second Amendment law, undisturbed until the incorporation ruling in McDonald (2010).

Economic Activity

Miller wrote for the Court. States may not regulate rates on interstate shipments, even for the portion within their borders.

Created the regulatory vacuum Congress filled within a year with the Interstate Commerce Act — the beginning of the federal administrative state.

Yick Wo v. Hopkins1886

118 U.S. 3569–0 unanimous
Civil Rights

Matthews wrote for a unanimous Court. A facially neutral ordinance administered 'with an evil eye and an unequal hand' denies equal protection — which extends to Chinese non-citizens.

The founding case of discriminatory-enforcement doctrine, and the era's clearest statement that the Constitution protects persons, not just citizens.

Kidd v. Pearson1888

128 U.S. 18–0 unanimous
Economic Activity

Lamar wrote for a unanimous Court. Manufacture is not commerce; Iowa could bar a distillery even though its entire output shipped interstate.

'Manufacture is transformation' — the production/commerce line that governed the commerce power from E.C. Knight to the New Deal.

The Fuller Court

1888–1910 · 22 cases
Economic Activity

Blatchford wrote for a 6–3 Court; Bradley (§41) in dissent said it practically overruled Munn. A rate scheme that makes commission-set rates final, with no judicial review of reasonableness, violates due process.

Opened the federal courts to rate-regulation review — the beginning of substantive due process in economic regulation.

In re Neagle1890

135 U.S. 16–2
Federalism

Lamar dissented, joined by Chief Justice Fuller (§50): no statute authorized the protection, so habeas should not lie. The majority held a deputy marshal protecting Justice Field (§38) acted under federal authority and was immune from state murder charges.

An early marker in the debate over inherent executive power — the dissent insisting that authority must come from Congress.

Budd v. New York1892

143 U.S. 5175–3
Economic Activity

Blatchford wrote for a 6–3 Court; Brewer (§51) dissented, with Field (§38) and Brown (§52). New York's legislatively fixed grain-elevator rates were constitutional, reaffirming Munn.

The counterweight to his own Chicago, Milwaukee opinion — regulation by legislature stands where regulation beyond review fell.

Church of the Holy Trinity v. United States1892

143 U.S. 4578–0 unanimous
First Amendment

Brewer wrote for a unanimous Court. The contract-labor act did not reach a church's hiring of an English pastor; a statute's spirit controls its letter.

The classic citation for purposive statutory interpretation — and, for its 'Christian nation' passage, a permanent flashpoint.

Counselman v. Hitchcock1892

142 U.S. 5479–0 unanimous
Criminal Procedure

Blatchford wrote for a unanimous Court. The Fifth Amendment privilege extends to grand-jury witnesses; an immunity statute must be as broad as the privilege.

Still the baseline of immunity law — every grant of witness immunity is measured against Counselman.

Economic Activity

Shiras wrote for a 5–4 Court over dissents by Brewer (§51), Field (§38), Jackson (§54), and White (§55). North Dakota's grain-elevator rate regulation was constitutional under Munn and Budd.

Held the Munn line for regulation in the teeth of the era's laissez-faire tide.

In re Debs1895

158 U.S. 5648–0 unanimous
Criminal Procedure

Brewer wrote for a unanimous Court. The federal courts could enjoin the Pullman strike and jail Eugene Debs for contempt; the government may protect interstate commerce and the mails in equity.

The charter of the labor injunction — organized labor's chief legal grievance until the Norris–LaGuardia Act of 1932.

Federal Taxation3 justicesalso called Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.

Fuller wrote for the Court. A federal tax on income from property is a direct tax that must be apportioned among the states, so the 1894 income tax is unconstitutional.

Struck down the income tax and stood until overturned by the Sixteenth Amendment (1913).

Brown dissented: 'nothing less than a surrender of the taxing power to the moneyed class.' The 1894 federal income tax was struck down 5–4 as an unapportioned direct tax.

The future author of Plessy as economic populist — the era's alignments were never simple.

Jackson, mortally ill, returned to break the 4–4 deadlock and voted to uphold the tax — dissenting when another justice's switch defeated it anyway. The 1894 income tax fell, 5–4, as an unapportioned direct tax.

'The most disastrous blow ever struck at the constitutional power of Congress' — a dying justice's protest, vindicated by the Sixteenth Amendment.

Economic Activity

Fuller wrote for the Court. The Sherman Antitrust Act does not reach a sugar-refining monopoly, because manufacturing is not interstate 'commerce.'

Crippled early antitrust enforcement and exemplified the narrow commerce doctrine later swept away by the New Deal Court.

Plessy v. Ferguson1896

163 U.S. 5377–1
Civil Rights2 justices

Harlan was the lone dissenter. (Dissenting) State-mandated racial segregation violates the Constitution; 'our Constitution is color-blind, and neither knows nor tolerates classes among citizens.'

The most celebrated dissent in the Court's history, vindicated when Brown v. Board of Education (1954, Warren §88) overruled Plessy.

Brown wrote the 7–1 majority; Harlan (§44) dissented alone; Brewer (§51) did not participate. Louisiana's 'equal, but separate' railway-car law did not violate the Thirteenth or Fourteenth Amendment.

The constitutional charter of Jim Crow for fifty-eight years, until Brown v. Board — and the opinion by which its author is remembered.

Wong Wing v. United States1896

163 U.S. 2289–0 unanimous
Criminal Procedure

Shiras wrote the opinion. Congress may not impose imprisonment at hard labor on aliens without a judicial trial; the Fifth and Sixth Amendments protect all persons.

A rare exclusion-era vindication of aliens' constitutional rights — decided the same term as Plessy.

Allgeyer v. Louisiana1897

165 U.S. 5789–0 unanimous
Economic Activity

Peckham wrote for a unanimous Court. The Fourteenth Amendment's 'liberty' includes freedom of contract; Louisiana's insurance restriction fell.

The first liberty-of-contract strike-down — the doctrinal seed of the Lochner era.

Holden v. Hardy1898

169 U.S. 3667–2
Economic Activity

Brown wrote for the Court; Brewer (§51) and Peckham (§56) dissented. Utah's eight-hour law for miners and smeltermen was a valid police-power protection of workers in dangerous trades.

The pre-Lochner path not taken — protective labor legislation sustained, seven years before the bakers' case.

United States v. Wong Kim Ark1898

169 U.S. 6497–2
Civil Rights

Gray wrote the 6–2 majority; Fuller (§50) dissented, with Harlan (§44). A child born in the United States to Chinese immigrant parents is a citizen at birth under the Fourteenth Amendment.

The foundation of American birthright citizenship — decided at the height of Chinese exclusion, against the political wind.

Downes v. Bidwell1901

182 U.S. 2445–4
Miscellaneous

Brown announced the judgment for a fractured 5–4 Court; the 'incorporation' doctrine came from White's (§55) concurrence. Puerto Rico was not 'part of the United States' for the Constitution's uniformity clause.

The keystone Insular Case — the Constitution does not follow the flag, a regime still governing the territories today.

Lochner v. New York1905

198 U.S. 455–4
Economic Activity3 justices

Harlan wrote a principal dissent, separate from Holmes's (§58). (Dissenting) States may regulate working hours to protect health and safety; judges should not substitute their economic views for the legislature's.

A powerful early argument against 'liberty of contract,' part of the long assault on Lochnerism.

Peckham wrote the 5–4 majority; Harlan (§44) and Holmes (§58) dissented. New York's ten-hour law for bakers violated liberty of contract.

The case that named an age — and, through Holmes's dissent, defined the modern debate over judicial restraint.

Holmes dissented from the Court's striking of a maximum-hours law. (Dissenting) The Constitution does not enshrine any particular economic theory; 'the Fourteenth Amendment does not enact Mr. Herbert Spencer's Social Statics.'

The classic statement of judicial restraint against 'liberty of contract,' vindicated when the Court abandoned Lochner in 1937.

Ex parte Young1908

209 U.S. 1238–1
Judicial Power

Peckham wrote the opinion; Harlan (§44) dissented. Federal courts may enjoin state officers from enforcing unconstitutional state laws, sovereign immunity notwithstanding.

The procedural engine of constitutional litigation ever since — every suit against a state officer runs through Young.

Economic Activity

Moody wrote a substantial dissent defending the commerce power. The Court struck the 1906 federal railroad-injury act, 5–4, as reaching employees outside interstate commerce.

Congress promptly re-enacted the statute on Moody's terms — the FELA that still governs railroad injuries today.

Loewe v. Lawlor (Danbury Hatters' Case)1908

208 U.S. 2749–0 unanimous
Unions

Fuller wrote for the Court. A union boycott in restraint of interstate trade violates the Sherman Antitrust Act, exposing union members to treble damages.

Turned antitrust law against organized labor — a blow to the union movement until Congress responded with the Clayton Act.

Muller v. Oregon1908

208 U.S. 4129–0 unanimous
Civil Rights

Brewer wrote for a unanimous Court, crediting Louis Brandeis's (§67) data-laden brief by name. Oregon's ten-hour law for women in laundries was constitutional, Lochner notwithstanding.

The 'Brandeis brief' enters constitutional law — social science as legal argument, from the Court's staunchest conservative.

Twining v. New Jersey1908

211 U.S. 788–1
Criminal Procedure

Moody wrote the 8–1 majority; Harlan (§44) dissented alone. The Fifth Amendment self-incrimination privilege does not apply against the states through the Fourteenth Amendment.

Its framework for what due process absorbs steered incorporation doctrine until Malloy v. Hogan (1964) overruled it.

Weems v. United States1910

217 U.S. 3494–2
Criminal Procedure

McKenna wrote for a short-handed Court, 4–2, over dissents by White (§55) and Holmes (§58). The Philippine cadena punishment was cruel and unusual; the Eighth Amendment is progressive, not frozen at 1791.

The origin of 'evolving standards' Eighth Amendment law — quoted in every modern punishment case from Trop to the death-penalty docket.

The White Court

1910–1921 · 18 cases

Coyle v. Smith1911

221 U.S. 5597–2
Miscellaneous

Lurton wrote for the Court, 7–2. Congress cannot bind a new state's choice of its own capital as a condition of admission; new states enter equal in sovereignty.

The classic statement of the equal-footing doctrine — Oklahoma moved its capital, and the Union stayed a union of equals.

Gompers v. Buck's Stove & Range Co.1911

221 U.S. 4189–0 unanimous
Unions

Lamar wrote for a unanimous Court. The contempt sentences against Gompers and his AFL colleagues were set aside on procedural grounds, while the injunction power over the boycott stood.

Spared the labor movement's leaders jail while preserving the weapon used against them — the era's labor settlement in miniature.

Economic Activity

White wrote for the Court, announcing the 'rule of reason.' The Sherman Antitrust Act prohibits only 'unreasonable' restraints of trade; the Standard Oil monopoly is one, and must be dissolved.

Broke up the era's greatest trust while establishing the reasonableness standard that still governs American antitrust law.

United States v. Terminal Railroad Association1912

224 U.S. 3836–0 unanimous
Economic Activity

Lurton wrote for the Court. The combination controlling all rail terminal facilities at St. Louis violated the Sherman Act unless opened to every carrier on equal terms.

The seed of the essential-facilities doctrine in antitrust law.

Hoke v. United States1913

227 U.S. 3089–0 unanimous
Civil Rights

McKenna wrote for a unanimous Court. The Mann Act was constitutional; Congress may bar interstate transportation for immoral purposes.

With Hipolite Egg, the commerce clause as national police power — the doctrinal road the New Deal later widened.

Weeks v. United States1914

232 U.S. 3839–0 unanimous
Criminal Procedure

Day wrote for a unanimous Court. Evidence seized from a home without a warrant must be excluded from a federal prosecution.

The birth of the exclusionary rule — extended to the states in Mapp v. Ohio nearly a half-century later.

Coppage v. Kansas1915

236 U.S. 16–3
Unions

Pitney wrote the 6–3 majority; Holmes (§58) dissented alone, Day (§59) with Hughes (§62). A state may not forbid employers to condition employment on staying out of a union; liberty of contract protects the yellow-dog contract.

The constitutional shield of the anti-union workplace until the New Deal cases dissolved it.

Frank v. Mangum1915

237 U.S. 3097–2
Criminal Procedure

Pitney wrote the 7–2 majority; Holmes (§58) and Hughes (§62) dissented. Leo Frank's mob-shadowed trial did not entitle him to federal habeas relief; state corrective process sufficed.

Eight years later Moore v. Dempsey adopted the dissent, founding modern federal habeas review — Frank himself had been lynched within months.

Guinn v. United States1915

238 U.S. 3479–0 unanimous
Civil Rights

White wrote for the Court. Oklahoma's 'grandfather clause,' exempting from a literacy test those whose ancestors could vote before 1866, is an unconstitutional evasion of the Fifteenth Amendment.

A rare Fifteenth Amendment victory in the Jim Crow era, striking one of the devices used to disenfranchise Black voters.

Miscellaneous

Lamar wrote for the majority; Day (§59) dissented. The President could withdraw public oil lands from private claim; long executive practice with congressional acquiescence implies authority.

'Government is a practical affair' — a cornerstone of implied executive power, cited from the steel seizure to modern emergencies.

Buchanan v. Warley1917

245 U.S. 609–0 unanimous
Civil Rights

Day wrote for a unanimous Court. Louisville's block-by-block residential segregation ordinance violated Fourteenth Amendment due process.

Framed as property rights rather than racial equality — but it stopped the spread of segregation-by-ordinance at the height of Jim Crow.

Economic Activity

Pitney wrote the 5–4 majority, as he had the unanimous New York Central v. White for New York's scheme weeks earlier. Washington's compulsory state-fund workers' compensation system was constitutional.

The author of Coppage secured the workmen's-compensation revolution — the era's alignments were never simple.

Hammer v. Dagenhart1918

247 U.S. 2515–4
Civil Rights

Day wrote the 5–4 majority; Holmes (§58) dissented, joined by McKenna (§57), Brandeis (§67), and Clarke (§68). The federal child-labor act exceeded the commerce power; regulation of production belongs to the states.

The high wall of dual federalism — and the target of one of Holmes's greatest dissents — until United States v. Darby leveled it in 1941.

Selective Draft Law Cases1918

245 U.S. 3669–0 unanimous
Miscellaneous

White wrote for a unanimous Court. The military draft for the First World War is a constitutional exercise of Congress's power to raise armies and does not impose 'involuntary servitude.'

Settled the constitutionality of conscription — the legal foundation for the draft in every subsequent war.

Abrams v. United States1919

250 U.S. 6167–2
First Amendment2 justices

Holmes dissented, months after Schenck, in a shift that reshaped his thought. (Dissenting) The First Amendment protects even the pamphlets of wartime radicals; 'the best test of truth is the power of the thought to get itself accepted in the competition of the market.'

The most influential dissent in free-speech history — the intellectual foundation of the 'marketplace of ideas.'

Clarke wrote the majority; Holmes (§58), joined by Brandeis (§67), dissented. Sedition Act convictions of leafleteers protesting intervention in Russia were affirmed, 7–2.

The opinion that drew 'free trade in ideas' from Holmes — modern First Amendment law begins in the answer to Clarke.

Schenck v. United States1919

249 U.S. 479–0 unanimous
First Amendment

Holmes wrote for a unanimous Court, coining the phrase and the 'shouting fire in a theatre' image. Speech creating a 'clear and present danger' of harms Congress may prevent — such as obstructing wartime conscription — is not protected.

The origin of the 'clear and present danger' test and the starting point of modern First Amendment law.

Evans v. Gore1920

253 U.S. 2457–2
Federal Taxation

Van Devanter wrote for the Court, 7–2; Holmes (§58) dissented, joined by Brandeis (§67). Applying the income tax to a sitting federal judge's salary unconstitutionally diminishes judicial compensation.

The high-water mark of judicial-compensation protection, pared back in 1939 and formally overruled in United States v. Hatter (2001).

Unions

Pitney wrote the 6–3 majority; Brandeis (§67) dissented, with Holmes (§58) and Clarke (§68). The Clayton Act's labor provisions do not shield secondary boycotts from federal injunction.

Kept the labor injunction alive for another decade, until Norris–LaGuardia (1932).

The Taft Court

1921–1930 · 13 cases
Federal Taxation

Taft wrote for the Court. Congress cannot use its taxing power as a pretext to regulate matters — here, child labor — reserved to the states.

Part of the pre-New Deal line limiting federal power over the economy; effectively overtaken after 1937.

Adkins v. Children's Hospital1923

261 U.S. 5255–3
Civil Rights

Sutherland wrote the majority; Taft (§69), joined by Sanford (§72), and Holmes (§58) dissented. The District of Columbia's minimum wage for women violated liberty of contract.

The doctrinal peak of liberty of contract — overruled by West Coast Hotel in 1937, over Sutherland's own dissent.

Meyer v. Nebraska1923

262 U.S. 3909–0 unanimous
Privacy

McReynolds wrote the 7–2 majority; Holmes (§58) dissented. Nebraska's ban on teaching modern foreign languages violated Fourteenth Amendment liberty.

Liberty 'to marry, establish a home and bring up children' — the wellspring of substantive-liberty doctrine from Griswold to Obergefell.

Gitlow v. New York1925

268 U.S. 6527–2
First Amendment

Sanford wrote the 7–2 majority; Holmes (§58) and Brandeis (§67) dissented. Gitlow's conviction stood — but the Court assumed that First Amendment speech and press liberties bind the states through the Fourteenth Amendment.

The assumption became the incorporation doctrine — nearly every liberty Americans hold against their states traces to this sentence.

Pierce v. Society of Sisters1925

268 U.S. 5109–0 unanimous
Due Process

McReynolds wrote for a unanimous Court. Oregon's compulsory public-school law unconstitutionally interfered with parents' control of their children's education.

'The child is not the mere creature of the State' — the charter of educational liberty and of every school-choice argument since.

Myers v. United States1926

272 U.S. 526–3
Miscellaneous

Taft, drawing on his own experience as President, wrote for the Court. The President has the constitutional power to remove executive officers he has appointed, without the Senate's consent.

A foundational and still-contested decision on presidential control of the executive branch, central to modern separation-of-powers disputes.

Economic Activity

Sutherland wrote the 6–3 majority, over the silent dissents of his fellow Horsemen. Comprehensive municipal zoning is a valid exercise of the police power.

The constitutional foundation of every zoning code in America — written by the Court's arch-conservative.

Buck v. Bell1927

274 U.S. 2008–1
Civil Rights2 justices

Holmes wrote for the Court. A state may forcibly sterilize the 'feebleminded'; 'three generations of imbeciles are enough.'

One of the Court's most infamous decisions, upholding eugenic sterilization; never formally overruled, it stands as a warning of restraint carried to a cruel extreme.

Butler dissented alone, without opinion. Virginia's compulsory-sterilization law was upheld, 8–1 — 'three generations of imbeciles are enough.'

The only vote against the Court's most infamous eugenics ruling — a silence historians still interrogate.

Fiske v. Kansas1927

274 U.S. 3809–0 unanimous
First Amendment

Sanford wrote for a unanimous Court. Kansas's criminal-syndicalism act, as applied to an organizer with no evidence of advocacy of violence, denied due process.

The first Supreme Court victory for a free-speech claimant against a state.

McGrain v. Daugherty1927

273 U.S. 1358–0 unanimous
Miscellaneous

Van Devanter wrote for a unanimous Court in the Senate's Teapot Dome-era probe of the Justice Department. Congress has implied power to compel private persons to testify in aid of its legislative function.

The foundation of congressional investigative power — cited in every subpoena battle from Watergate to the present.

Whitney v. California1927

274 U.S. 3579–0 unanimous
First Amendment2 justices

Brandeis concurred, in an opinion more celebrated than the majority. (Concurring) Free speech is essential to self-government; the answer to dangerous speech is 'more speech, not enforced silence,' unless the danger is truly imminent.

The most eloquent defense of free speech in the Court's history, its reasoning later adopted as constitutional law in Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969).

Sanford wrote the majority; Brandeis (§67), joined by Holmes (§58), concurred separately. Anita Whitney's syndicalism conviction was affirmed.

Remembered almost entirely for the Brandeis concurrence — 'more speech, not enforced silence' — canonized when Brandenburg overruled Whitney in 1969.

Olmstead v. United States1928

277 U.S. 4385–4
Criminal Procedure3 justices

Brandeis dissented from Taft's (§69) majority allowing warrantless wiretaps. (Dissenting) Wiretapping violates the Fourth Amendment; the framers conferred 'the right to be let alone — the most comprehensive of rights and the right most valued by civilized men.'

The founding text of the constitutional right to privacy, vindicated when the Court overruled Olmstead in Katz v. United States (1967, Stewart §92).

Taft wrote for the Court, over a famous dissent by Brandeis (§67) defending 'the right to be let alone.' Wiretapping a telephone without any physical trespass is not a 'search or seizure' under the Fourth Amendment.

Governed electronic surveillance until overruled by Katz v. United States (1967, Stewart §92); Brandeis's dissent became one of the most influential in the Court's history.

Butler dissented separately, alongside Brandeis (§67), Holmes (§58), and Stone (§73). Warrantless wiretapping was held no Fourth Amendment search; the conviction stood 5–4.

The conservative's textual case against wiretapping — vindicated when Katz overruled Olmstead in 1967.

United States v. Schwimmer1929

279 U.S. 6446–3
Civil Rights

Butler wrote the 6–3 majority; Holmes (§58) dissented — 'freedom for the thought that we hate.' A pacifist unwilling to promise to bear arms could be denied naturalization.

Overruled in 1946 — but immortal as the provocation for Holmes's final great dissent.

The Hughes Court

1930–1941 · 20 cases

Near v. Minnesota1931

283 U.S. 6975–4
First Amendment

Hughes wrote for the Court. Government may almost never impose a prior restraint forbidding publication; a law authorizing courts to shut down 'malicious' newspapers is unconstitutional.

The foundational free-press decision against prior restraint, later decisive in the Pentagon Papers case.

New State Ice Co. v. Liebmann1932

285 U.S. 2626–2
Economic Activity

Brandeis dissented. (Dissenting) A state may regulate entry into the ice business; a 'single courageous State may, if its citizens choose, serve as a laboratory' for social and economic experiment.

Coined the enduring idea of the states as 'laboratories of democracy,' a cornerstone of American federalism.

Powell v. Alabama1932

287 U.S. 457–2
Civil Rights

Sutherland wrote the 7–2 majority; Butler (§71) and McReynolds (§66) dissented. Due process required the effective appointment of counsel for the Scottsboro defendants in a capital case.

The beginning of the constitutional right to counsel — the road that leads to Gideon.

Nebbia v. New York1934

291 U.S. 5025–4
Economic Activity

Roberts wrote the 5–4 majority over the Four Horsemen's dissent. New York's milk-price regulation was constitutional; price control is valid if reasonably related to public welfare.

The first crack in the old economic constitution — three years before the switch it foreshadowed.

Economic Activity

McReynolds wrote the Horsemen's dissent — and reportedly declared from the bench that the Constitution 'as we have known it, is gone.' The 5–4 majority sustained the abrogation of gold clauses in private contracts.

The old order's cry of despair, delivered extemporaneously as the New Deal's monetary policy survived.

Civil Rights

Butler wrote the majority. New York's minimum wage for women fell, 5–4, under Adkins.

Liberty of contract's last stand — overturned within a year by West Coast Hotel.

United States v. Butler1936

297 U.S. 16–3
Federal Taxation

Roberts wrote the 6–3 majority; Stone (§73) answered that 'the only check upon our own exercise of power is our own sense of self-restraint.' The Agricultural Adjustment Act's processing tax invaded the states' reserved powers.

The 'T-square' passage became the standard citation for mechanical jurisprudence — usually by its critics.

Miscellaneous

Sutherland wrote the 7–1 majority. The arms-embargo delegation was valid; the President is the 'sole organ' of the nation in international relations.

The most-cited foundation of executive foreign-affairs power — its sweeping dicta debated in every war-powers and foreign-policy fight since.

Helvering v. Davis1937

301 U.S. 6197–2
Federal Taxation

Cardozo wrote for the Court. The old-age benefits program of the Social Security Act is a constitutional exercise of Congress's power to spend for the general welfare.

Upheld the heart of Social Security and the constitutional basis of the modern welfare state.

NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.1937

301 U.S. 19–0 unanimous
Unions

Hughes wrote for the Court. Congress may regulate labor relations in manufacturing under the Commerce Clause because industrial strife affects interstate commerce.

Upheld the Wagner Act and vastly expanded federal commerce power — a constitutional cornerstone of the New Deal order.

Palko v. Connecticut1937

302 U.S. 3198–1
Criminal Procedure

Cardozo wrote for the Court. Only those provisions of the Bill of Rights 'implicit in the concept of ordered liberty' apply against the states through the Fourteenth Amendment.

Set out the theory of 'selective incorporation' that governed which federal rights bind the states — the framework of incorporation doctrine for a generation.

Steward Machine Co. v. Davis1937

301 U.S. 5485–4
Federal Taxation

Cardozo wrote for the Court. The federal-state unemployment compensation scheme financed by a payroll tax is constitutional.

Sustained the second pillar of Social Security, confirming Congress's broad power to tax and spend for social welfare.

West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish1937

300 U.S. 3795–4
Civil Rights2 justices

Hughes wrote for the Court. A state minimum-wage law for women does not violate 'liberty of contract'; the Constitution permits reasonable economic regulation.

The 'switch in time' — the case that ended the Lochner era of judicial hostility to economic regulation and cleared the way for the modern regulatory state.

Roberts silently joined Hughes's (§62) 5–4 majority — the 'switch in time' — his vote cast in conference weeks before the Court-packing plan was announced. Washington's minimum wage for women was upheld, overruling Adkins.

The end of the Lochner era; whether Roberts switched under pressure or on the record remains the era's favorite argument.

Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins1938

304 U.S. 648–0 unanimous
Judicial Power

Brandeis wrote for the Court, overruling Swift v. Tyson (1842, Story §18). In diversity cases federal courts must apply state law; 'there is no federal general common law.'

One of the most important decisions on the structure of the federal courts, reshaping the relationship between state and federal law.

Economic Activity

Stone wrote for the Court, and wrote the footnote. Economic regulation is presumed constitutional — but the presumption may narrow for laws touching the political process or aimed at 'discrete and insular minorities' (the celebrated Footnote Four).

Footnote Four became the blueprint for modern civil-rights and civil-liberties law and the tiers of judicial scrutiny.

United States v. Miller1939

307 U.S. 1748–0 unanimous
Criminal Procedure

McReynolds wrote for a unanimous Court. A sawed-off shotgun, absent evidence of militia utility, is not protected by the Second Amendment.

The Supreme Court's only substantial Second Amendment holding for nearly seventy years, until Heller (2008).

First Amendment2 justices

Stone was the lone dissenter. (Dissenting) Compelling Jehovah's Witness schoolchildren to salute the flag violates freedom of conscience.

His dissent prevailed when the Court reversed itself three years later in West Virginia v. Barnette (Robert Jackson §82) — a rare and rapid vindication.

Frankfurter wrote for the Court. A state may compel schoolchildren, including Jehovah's Witnesses, to salute the flag; national unity outweighs the objection of conscience.

A high-water mark of judicial deference — swiftly repudiated when the Court reversed itself in West Virginia v. Barnette (1943, Robert Jackson §82).

Thornhill v. Alabama1940

310 U.S. 888–1
First Amendment

Murphy wrote the 8–1 majority. Peaceful labor picketing is speech protected by the First Amendment.

Labor's great free-speech victory — the ex-governor who refused to break the Flint strike constitutionalized the picket line.

Edwards v. California1941

314 U.S. 1609–0 unanimous
Economic Activity

Byrnes wrote for a unanimous Court; Douglas (§79) and Jackson (§82) concurred on right-to-travel grounds. California's law criminalizing the transport of indigent migrants into the state violated the Commerce Clause.

The Depression's 'anti-Okie' laws fell — persons, Byrnes wrote, are not 'a moral pestilence' to be quarantined at state lines.

United States v. Darby1941

312 U.S. 1008–0 unanimous
Unions

Stone wrote for a unanimous Court. Congress may set national wage and hour standards under the Commerce Clause; Hammer v. Dagenhart is overruled.

Completed the New Deal constitutional settlement, removing judicial barriers to federal economic regulation for decades.

The Stone Court

1941–1946 · 8 cases

Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire1942

315 U.S. 5689–0 unanimous
First Amendment

Murphy wrote for a unanimous Court. 'Fighting words' — insults likely to provoke immediate violence — fall outside First Amendment protection.

Still the framework for every categorical exception to free speech — endlessly cited, steadily narrowed.

Skinner v. Oklahoma1942

316 U.S. 5359–0 unanimous
Civil Rights

Douglas wrote for the Court. A law ordering the sterilization of certain repeat criminals violates equal protection; procreation is 'one of the basic civil rights of man.'

An early recognition of fundamental rights and heightened scrutiny, and a repudiation of the eugenic thinking of Buck v. Bell.

First Amendment2 justices

Frankfurter dissented alone, in a deeply personal opinion as a Jewish immigrant defending restraint. (Dissenting) Courts should defer to elected officials even on the compelled flag salute; judges must not enforce their own view of wise policy.

The most eloquent statement of judicial restraint against even a sympathetic claim — the counterpoint to Jackson's majority.

Jackson wrote for the Court, overruling Gobitis (1940, Frankfurter §78). The state may not compel schoolchildren to salute the flag; 'no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox' in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion.

One of the greatest free-speech and freedom-of-conscience opinions ever written, and a rare rapid reversal by the Court.

Korematsu v. United States1944

323 U.S. 2146–3
Civil Rights4 justices

Roberts dissented: the facts showed 'a clear violation of Constitutional rights.' The exclusion of Japanese Americans from the West Coast was upheld, 6–3.

The Court's swing conservative called the internment what it was — company for Murphy's (§80) and Jackson's (§82) dissents in the case history condemned.

Black wrote for the Court. The wartime exclusion of Japanese Americans from the West Coast did not violate the Constitution.

A grave failure of the Court, upholding internment on the basis of race and military claims; repudiated by history and formally disavowed by the Court in 2018.

Murphy dissented: the order fell 'into the ugly abyss of racism.' The wartime exclusion of Japanese Americans was upheld, 6–3.

The dissent history vindicated — quoted when the Court finally repudiated Korematsu in Trump v. Hawaii (2018).

Jackson dissented from Black's (§76) majority. (Dissenting) The Court should not validate the racial internment of citizens; the principle 'lies about like a loaded weapon' ready for reuse.

A prophetic warning against deferring to claims of military necessity at the expense of constitutional rights.

Prince v. Massachusetts1944

321 U.S. 1588–1
Civil Rights

Rutledge wrote for the Court. Child-labor laws may be applied to a child distributing religious literature over a free-exercise objection.

'Parents may be free to become martyrs themselves. But it does not follow they are free… to make martyrs of their children' — still the touchstone for state power over children's welfare.

Smith v. Allwright1944

321 U.S. 6498–1
Civil Rights

Reed wrote the 8–1 majority — reassigned from Frankfurter (§78) so a southern Protestant Democrat would speak for the Court. The Texas Democratic Party's whites-only primary violated the Fifteenth Amendment; Grovey v. Townsend was overruled.

The beginning of the end of the white primary — the first great modern voting-rights decision.

Thomas v. Collins1945

323 U.S. 5165–4
First Amendment

Rutledge wrote the 5–4 majority. Texas could not require union organizers to register before making an organizing speech.

The 'preferred position' of First Amendment freedoms — the phrase and the priority both trace here.

In re Yamashita1946

327 U.S. 16–2
Criminal Procedure2 justices

Murphy dissented, alongside Rutledge (§83). The military-commission conviction of General Yamashita was upheld, 6–2.

'An uncurbed spirit of revenge and retribution, masked in formal legal procedure, can do more lasting harm than all of the atrocities giving rise to that spirit.'

Rutledge dissented at length, with Murphy (§80). The military commission's death sentence on General Yamashita stood, 6–2.

'It is not too early, it is never too early, for the nation steadfastly to follow its great constitutional traditions' — the dissent later generations cited from Nuremberg to Guantánamo.

The Vinson Court

1946–1953 · 10 cases

Adamson v. California1947

332 U.S. 465–4
Criminal Procedure

Reed wrote the 5–4 majority; Black (§76) answered with his total-incorporation dissent. The Fifth Amendment's self-incrimination privilege did not apply to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment.

The stage for the incorporation debate that consumed the next two decades — Reed's holding fell in Malloy v. Hogan (1964).

First Amendment2 justices

Black wrote for the Court. The Establishment Clause erects 'a wall of separation between church and State' and binds the states — though reimbursing parents for bus fare to parochial schools does not breach it.

Applied the Establishment Clause to the states and set the terms of church-state debate for decades.

Rutledge wrote the principal dissent, joined by Frankfurter (§78), Jackson (§82), and Burton (§84). New Jersey's reimbursement of bus fares to parochial-school parents was upheld, 5–4, even as the Court adopted separationist principles.

The purest statement of church-state separation in the U.S. Reports — 'complete and permanent' — and the pole star of one side of the debate ever since.

Shelley v. Kraemer1948

334 U.S. 16–0 unanimous
Civil Rights

Vinson wrote for the Court (three justices recused). Judicial enforcement of a racially restrictive covenant is state action forbidden by the Equal Protection Clause.

Struck a major legal prop from residential segregation and prefigured the Court's turn against Jim Crow.

Henderson v. United States1950

339 U.S. 8168–0 unanimous
Civil Rights

Burton wrote for a unanimous Court. Segregated railroad dining-car arrangements violated the Interstate Commerce Act.

Decided the same day as Sweatt and McLaurin — the 1950 trilogy that set the table for Brown.

Sweatt v. Painter1950

339 U.S. 6299–0 unanimous
Civil Rights

Vinson wrote for a unanimous Court. A hastily created 'separate' Black law school was not equal to the University of Texas's, which the state must therefore integrate.

One of the graduate-education cases that undermined 'separate but equal' and set the stage for Brown v. Board of Education.

United States v. Rabinowitz1950

339 U.S. 565–3
Criminal Procedure

Minton wrote the 5–3 majority. A warrantless search of the arrestee's premises incident to a lawful arrest was reasonable under the Fourth Amendment.

Governed search-incident doctrine for two decades until Chimel v. California (1969) — and Frankfurter's (§78) dissent became the law.

Dennis v. United States1951

341 U.S. 4946–2
First Amendment

Vinson wrote the plurality opinion. The First Amendment does not bar convicting Communist Party leaders under the Smith Act for conspiring to advocate the overthrow of the government.

The high-water mark of Cold War restrictions on political speech, later sharply narrowed as the 'clear and present danger' test gave way to stronger speech protections.

Adler v. Board of Education1952

342 U.S. 4856–3
First Amendment

Minton wrote the 6–3 majority; Black (§76) and Douglas (§79) dissented. New York's Feinberg Law, barring members of listed subversive organizations from teaching, was upheld.

The high-water mark of loyalty-era deference — effectively overruled by Keyishian (1967), which made academic freedom 'a special concern of the First Amendment.'

Miscellaneous

Jackson's concurrence set out the famous three-tier framework for presidential power. (Concurring) The President lacked power to seize the steel mills; presidential authority is 'at its lowest ebb' when he acts against the will of Congress.

The single most influential opinion on the separation of powers, cited in virtually every modern dispute over executive authority.

Toolson v. New York Yankees1953

346 U.S. 3567–2
Economic Activity

Burton dissented, joined by Reed (§77): baseball was plainly interstate commerce. Baseball's judge-made antitrust exemption was reaffirmed, 7–2, on congressional inaction.

The dissent nearly every later court and commentator has sided with — the exemption survives as an acknowledged anomaly.

The Warren Court

1953–1969 · 24 cases

Brown v. Board of Education1954

347 U.S. 4839–0 unanimous
Civil Rights2 justices
Earl Warren§889–0

Warren wrote for a unanimous Court, having worked to secure unanimity. Racial segregation in public schools violates the Equal Protection Clause; 'separate educational facilities are inherently unequal.'

The most important decision of the twentieth century — the constitutional foundation of the civil-rights movement and the end of Plessy's 'separate but equal.'

Marshall argued the case as lead NAACP counsel; the Court's unanimous opinion was written by Chief Justice Warren (§88). State-sponsored segregation of public schools is unconstitutional.

The defining victory of Marshall's career as an advocate and the legal foundation of the civil-rights movement.

NAACP v. Alabama1958

357 U.S. 4499–0 unanimous
First Amendment

Harlan wrote for a unanimous Court. The state may not compel the NAACP to disclose its membership lists; freedom of association is protected by the First and Fourteenth Amendments.

Established the constitutional freedom of association, shielding civil-rights and other groups from state harassment.

Draper v. United States1959

358 U.S. 3076–1
Criminal Procedure

Whittaker wrote the majority; Douglas (§79) dissented alone. An informant's tip, corroborated in detail by the arresting officer's own observations, supplies probable cause for a warrantless arrest.

Still a staple of probable-cause doctrine — his one securely remembered opinion.

Mapp v. Ohio1961

367 U.S. 6436–3
Criminal Procedure

Clark wrote the majority (6–3 in judgment, five justices on the Fourth Amendment holding). Evidence obtained by unconstitutional search and seizure is inadmissible in state court; Wolf v. Colorado overruled.

The criminal-procedure revolution's opening gun — the exclusionary rule nationalized.

Poe v. Ullman1961

367 U.S. 4975–4
Judicial Power

Harlan dissented from the Court's refusal to reach the merits. (Dissenting) The Constitution's guarantee of 'liberty' is a 'rational continuum' protecting intimate personal decisions, including a married couple's use of contraceptives.

The intellectual foundation of the right to privacy soon adopted in Griswold (1965, Douglas §79), and a touchstone of substantive due process.

Baker v. Carr1962

369 U.S. 1866–2
Civil Rights2 justices

Frankfurter dissented from the decision opening reapportionment to judicial review. (Dissenting) The apportionment of legislative districts is a 'political question' unfit for the courts — a 'political thicket' the judiciary should not enter.

His final major battle, and defeat; the Court's rejection of his view launched the 'one person, one vote' revolution.

Brennan wrote for the Court, over Frankfurter's (§78) dissent. The apportionment of legislative districts presents a justiciable question that federal courts may decide.

Opened the door to the reapportionment revolution and 'one person, one vote'; Warren (§88) called it the most important case of his tenure.

Engel v. Vitale1962

370 U.S. 4216–1
First Amendment

Black wrote for the Court. Official prayer composed for recitation in the public schools violates the Establishment Clause.

Removed state-sponsored prayer from public schools — one of the most controversial and enduring church-state rulings.

First Amendment

Clark wrote the 8–1 majority; Stewart (§92) dissented. School-sponsored Bible reading and prayer violate the Establishment Clause.

The secular purpose and primary-effect test — the core of establishment doctrine for the next half-century.

Gideon v. Wainwright1963

372 U.S. 3359–0 unanimous
Criminal Procedure
Hugo L. Black§769–0

Black wrote for a unanimous Court, vindicating his own dissent from twenty years earlier. The Sixth Amendment right to counsel applies to the states; a poor defendant facing serious charges is entitled to a court-appointed lawyer.

Guaranteed legal representation to millions of indigent defendants — a pillar of modern criminal justice.

Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez1963

372 U.S. 1445–4
Civil Rights

Goldberg wrote the majority. Automatically stripping citizenship for draft evasion is punishment that requires a criminal trial.

'While the Constitution protects against invasions of individual rights, it is not a suicide pact' — the balance-in-crisis line quoted ever since.

Escobedo v. Illinois1964

378 U.S. 4785–4
Criminal Procedure

Goldberg wrote the 5–4 majority. Once an investigation focuses on a suspect in custody, denial of counsel during interrogation violates the Sixth Amendment.

The direct precursor of Miranda — the interrogation room's door opened to lawyers.

Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States1964

379 U.S. 2419–0 unanimous
Civil Rights

Clark wrote for a unanimous Court, as in the companion Katzenbach v. McClung. The Civil Rights Act's public-accommodations title was valid under the commerce power.

The constitutional green light for the Second Reconstruction, delivered by a Texan two months after the Act passed.

Jacobellis v. Ohio1964

378 U.S. 1846–3
First Amendment

Stewart concurred: 'I know it when I see it, and the motion picture involved in this case is not that.' An Ohio obscenity conviction was reversed; only 'hard-core pornography' may be criminalized.

The most famous shrug in the U.S. Reports — candor about definition that doctrine never escaped.

New York Times Co. v. Sullivan1964

376 U.S. 2549–0 unanimous
First Amendment

Brennan wrote for the Court. A public official cannot recover for defamation without proving 'actual malice' — knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard for the truth.

Transformed American libel law and gave constitutional protection to robust, even erroneous, criticism of government — 'uninhibited, robust, and wide-open.'

Reynolds v. Sims1964

377 U.S. 5338–1
Civil Rights
Earl Warren§888–1

Warren wrote for the Court; he called it the most important decision of his tenure. The Equal Protection Clause requires state legislative districts to be roughly equal in population — 'one person, one vote.'

Reordered representative government in every state, ending rural over-representation and reshaping American democracy.

Griswold v. Connecticut1965

381 U.S. 4797–2
Privacy2 justices

Douglas wrote for the Court. The Constitution protects a right to marital privacy, found in the 'penumbras' and 'emanations' of the Bill of Rights; a state may not ban contraceptives for married couples.

Established the constitutional right to privacy — the doctrinal foundation of Roe v. Wade and the modern privacy cases.

Goldberg concurred, joined by Warren (§88) and Brennan (§90), grounding unenumerated rights partly in the Ninth Amendment. Connecticut's ban on contraceptives for married couples was unconstitutional.

The Ninth Amendment's great modern moment — a text 'forgotten' until Goldberg reread it.

Miranda v. Arizona1966

384 U.S. 4365–4
Criminal Procedure
Earl Warren§885–4

Warren, a former prosecutor, wrote for the Court. Before custodial interrogation, police must warn suspects of their rights to silence and to counsel; statements taken without such warnings are inadmissible.

Made 'you have the right to remain silent' part of American life and the law of police interrogation.

Sheppard v. Maxwell1966

384 U.S. 3338–1
Criminal Procedure

Clark wrote the 8–1 majority. Massive, unrestrained pretrial and trial publicity denied Sam Sheppard due process.

The charter of fair-trial/free-press balance — trial judges must control the 'carnival atmosphere.'

In re Gault1967

387 U.S. 18–1
Civil Rights

Fortas wrote the majority. Juveniles facing delinquency proceedings are entitled to notice, counsel, confrontation, and the privilege against self-incrimination.

Due process reached the juvenile court — 'the condition of being a boy does not justify a kangaroo court.'

Katz v. United States1967

389 U.S. 3477–1
Criminal Procedure

Stewart wrote the majority. Wiretapping a public phone booth is a Fourth Amendment search requiring a warrant.

'The Fourth Amendment protects people, not places' — the foundation of privacy doctrine in the electronic age.

Loving v. Virginia1967

388 U.S. 19–0 unanimous
Civil Rights
Earl Warren§889–0

Warren wrote for a unanimous Court. State laws banning interracial marriage violate the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses.

Struck down anti-miscegenation laws nationwide and later became a cornerstone of the argument for marriage equality in Obergefell (§104).

Epperson v. Arkansas1968

393 U.S. 979–0 unanimous
First Amendment

Fortas wrote for the Court. Arkansas's ban on teaching evolution violated the Establishment Clause.

Scopes's ghost finally laid — the state may not tailor the curriculum to any religious doctrine.

Stanley v. Georgia1969

394 U.S. 5579–0 unanimous
First Amendment

Marshall wrote for the Court. The government may not criminalize the private possession of obscene material in one's own home.

A landmark of privacy and freedom of thought — 'a State has no business telling a man, sitting alone in his own house, what books he may read.'

First Amendment

Fortas wrote the majority. Students wearing black armbands against the Vietnam War engaged in protected speech; schools may punish only substantial disruption.

The schoolhouse-gate line — still the framework for every student-speech case.

The Burger Court

1969–1986 · 12 cases

Cohen v. California1971

403 U.S. 155–4
First Amendment

Harlan wrote for the Court. A state may not punish the wearing of a jacket bearing an offensive antiwar slogan; 'one man's vulgarity is another's lyric.'

A cornerstone of free-speech law, protecting offensive and emotive expression from government censorship.

Lemon v. Kurtzman1971

403 U.S. 6028–0 unanimous
First Amendment

Burger wrote for the Court, creating the three-part 'Lemon test.' State aid to religious schools is unconstitutional unless it has a secular purpose, does not principally advance religion, and avoids 'excessive entanglement' with religion.

Governed Establishment Clause law for half a century before the Court abandoned it in 2022.

Civil Rights

Burger wrote for a unanimous Court. Federal courts may order busing and other broad remedies to dismantle stubbornly segregated school systems.

Authorized the busing era of school desegregation, among the most consequential and contested remedies in civil-rights law.

Furman v. Georgia1972

408 U.S. 2385–4
Criminal Procedure2 justices

Stewart concurred on the arbitrariness of its infliction. The death penalty as then administered was unconstitutional, 5–4, in a one-paragraph per curiam with nine opinions.

'Cruel and unusual in the same way that being struck by lightning is cruel and unusual' — the concurrence that framed the modern death-penalty debate.

Marshall concurred in the judgment that briefly halted executions nationwide. (Concurring) The death penalty as then administered was unconstitutional; Marshall argued it is cruel and unusual in all circumstances.

The fullest statement of his lifelong view that capital punishment is unconstitutional, which he maintained in dissent for the rest of his tenure.

Sierra Club v. Morton1972

405 U.S. 7274–3
Economic Activity

Douglas dissented in a landmark of environmental thought. (Dissenting) Natural objects — valleys, rivers, trees — should have legal standing, through guardians, to sue for their own protection.

The most famous argument in American law for the 'rights of nature,' cited worldwide in environmental jurisprudence.

Roe v. Wade1973

410 U.S. 1137–2
Privacy2 justices

White dissented from Blackmun's (§98) majority. (Dissenting) The recognition of a constitutional right to abortion is 'an exercise of raw judicial power' with no basis in the Constitution's text or history.

An early and influential statement of the critique of Roe that animated its opponents for half a century.

Blackmun wrote for the Court. The constitutional right of privacy is broad enough to encompass a woman's decision to end a pregnancy, subject to increasing state regulation as it progresses.

The most famous and most contested opinion of the modern era; its trimester framework fell in Casey (1992, O'Connor §102) and the right itself in Dobbs (2022, Alito §110).

United States v. Nixon1974

418 U.S. 6838–0 unanimous
Criminal Procedure

Burger wrote for a unanimous Court (Rehnquist §100 recused). Executive privilege is not absolute and must yield to the need for evidence in a criminal trial; the President must produce the subpoenaed Watergate tapes.

Reaffirmed that not even the President is above the law's demand for evidence; it forced Nixon's resignation.

Gregg v. Georgia1976

428 U.S. 1537–2
Criminal Procedure

Stewart announced the judgment in the joint lead opinion with Powell (§99) and Stevens (§101). Guided-discretion capital statutes are constitutional; the death penalty resumed.

With Furman, Stewart authored both poles of American capital-punishment law.

Washington v. Davis1976

426 U.S. 2297–2
Civil Rights

White wrote for the Court. A law is not unconstitutional under the Equal Protection Clause merely because it has a racially disproportionate impact; proof of discriminatory purpose is required.

One of the most consequential doctrines in equal-protection law, sharply limiting constitutional challenges to facially neutral policies.

Civil Rights

Powell's solo controlling opinion held the balance on a Court split four to four. Rigid racial quotas in admissions are unconstitutional, but race may be considered as one factor among many in pursuit of a diverse student body.

His 'diversity' rationale became the law of university admissions from Bakke through Grutter (2003, O'Connor §102) until the Court rejected it in 2023.

Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. NRDC1984

467 U.S. 8376–0 unanimous
Economic Activity

Stevens wrote for the Court. When a statute is ambiguous, courts must defer to any reasonable interpretation by the agency that administers it.

For forty years the foundation of administrative law and the balance of power between courts and agencies, until overruled in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo (2024).

Bowers v. Hardwick1986

478 U.S. 1865–4
Privacy2 justices

White wrote for the Court. The Constitution confers no fundamental right to engage in homosexual sodomy.

A defeat for gay rights overruled seventeen years later in Lawrence v. Texas (2003, Kennedy §104).

Powell provided the decisive fifth vote (the opinion was written by White §93); he soon called his vote 'probably' a mistake. The Constitution confers no fundamental right to engage in homosexual sodomy; a state may criminalize it.

Overruled seventeen years later in Lawrence v. Texas (2003, Kennedy §104); Powell's public second thoughts are nearly unique in the Court's history.

The Rehnquist Court

1986–2005 · 17 cases

McCleskey v. Kemp1987

481 U.S. 2795–4
Criminal Procedure

Powell wrote for the Court. Statistical evidence of systemwide racial disparity in capital sentencing does not prove unconstitutional discrimination in a particular case.

A pivotal death-penalty ruling; Powell later told his biographer it was the vote he would change.

Morrison v. Olson1988

487 U.S. 6547–1
Miscellaneous

Scalia dissented alone. (Dissenting) The independent-counsel law violates the separation of powers by stripping the President of control over executive functions; 'this wolf comes as a wolf.'

Derided at the time, his dissent's theory of the 'unitary executive' steadily gained force and is now widely regarded as vindicated.

DeShaney v. Winnebago County1989

489 U.S. 1896–3
Civil Rights

Blackmun dissented. (Dissenting) The state's failure to protect a boy from a violent father — leaving him permanently brain-damaged — should not escape constitutional accountability. 'Poor Joshua!'

One of the most emotionally powerful dissents in the U.S. Reports, and a landmark in the debate over whether law should speak in the language of feeling.

Texas v. Johnson1989

491 U.S. 3975–4
First Amendment

Brennan wrote for the Court. Burning the American flag in political protest is expressive conduct protected by the First Amendment.

A powerful affirmation that government may not punish a symbol's desecration; it has withstood repeated efforts to overturn it by constitutional amendment.

Employment Division v. Smith1990

494 U.S. 8726–3
First Amendment

Scalia wrote for the Court. A neutral, generally applicable law does not violate the Free Exercise Clause merely because it burdens a religious practice.

Sharply narrowed constitutional protection for religious exercise, prompting Congress to pass the Religious Freedom Restoration Act and igniting a debate that continues today.

Planned Parenthood v. Casey1992

505 U.S. 8335–4
Privacy2 justices

O'Connor co-authored the controlling joint opinion with Kennedy (§104) and Souter (§105). The 'central holding' of Roe is reaffirmed, but states may regulate abortion so long as they do not impose an 'undue burden.'

Preserved the constitutional right to abortion for a generation, on grounds of precedent and the Court's legitimacy, until Dobbs (2022, Alito §110).

Souter co-authored the joint opinion with O'Connor (§102) and Kennedy (§104); the stare decisis section is widely credited to him. Roe's essential holding was reaffirmed under stare decisis; the undue-burden standard replaced the trimester framework.

The centrist settlement that governed abortion law for thirty years, until Dobbs unsettled it.

Blackmun dissented alone, at the end of his career. (Dissenting from denial of certiorari) The death penalty cannot be administered consistently with the Constitution; 'I shall no longer tinker with the machinery of death.'

His final renunciation of capital punishment, joining Marshall (§96) and Brennan (§90) in categorical opposition.

United States v. Lopez1995

514 U.S. 5495–4
Federalism

Rehnquist wrote for the Court. Congress exceeded its commerce power in banning guns near schools; the Commerce Clause has judicially enforceable limits.

The first decision since 1937 to strike a federal statute as beyond the commerce power — the keystone of the modern federalism revival.

United States v. Virginia1996

518 U.S. 5157–1
Civil Rights

Ginsburg wrote for the Court. The state's exclusion of women from the Virginia Military Institute violates equal protection; sex-based classifications require an 'exceedingly persuasive justification.'

The capstone of the sex-equality revolution she had led as an advocate, near the high-water mark of constitutional protection against sex discrimination.

Washington v. Glucksberg1997

521 U.S. 7029–0 unanimous
Privacy

Rehnquist wrote for the Court. There is no constitutional right to physician-assisted suicide; substantive due process protects only rights deeply rooted in the nation's history and tradition.

A landmark limiting the expansion of unenumerated rights, central to modern due-process debates including Dobbs (§110).

Bush v. Gore2000

531 U.S. 985–4
Civil Rights2 justices

Stevens wrote a stinging dissent. (Dissenting) Halting the Florida recount was a grave error; 'the identity of the loser is perfectly clear. It is the Nation's confidence in the judge as an impartial guardian of the rule of law.'

His most quoted dissent — a warning about the Court's legitimacy after it effectively decided a presidential election.

Souter dissented: the state should have been allowed to complete a recount under a uniform standard. Florida's recount was halted; the election effectively decided.

One of four dissents in the case that tested the Court's claim to stand outside politics.

Dickerson v. United States2000

530 U.S. 4287–2
Criminal Procedure

Rehnquist, a longtime Miranda skeptic, wrote for the Court. Miranda v. Arizona is a constitutional rule that Congress cannot legislatively overrule.

A striking instance of institutional stewardship overriding a Chief Justice's own doctrinal instincts.

Stenberg v. Carhart2000

530 U.S. 9145–4
Privacy

Breyer wrote the 5–4 majority. Nebraska's 'partial-birth abortion' ban, lacking a health exception, was unconstitutional.

The Casey framework applied at its edge — partially superseded by Gonzales v. Carhart (2007) after O'Connor's (§102) retirement.

Grutter v. Bollinger2003

539 U.S. 3065–4
Civil Rights

O'Connor wrote for the Court, adding that she expected such preferences to be unnecessary within twenty-five years. A university may consider race as one factor in a holistic admissions process to achieve the educational benefits of diversity.

The high-water mark of affirmative action, embracing Powell's (§99) Bakke rationale, until the Court ended race-conscious admissions in 2023 — two decades ahead of her timetable.

Lawrence v. Texas2003

539 U.S. 5586–3
Privacy

Kennedy wrote for the Court, overruling Bowers v. Hardwick (1986, White §93). Laws criminalizing intimate conduct between adults of the same sex violate the liberty protected by the Due Process Clause.

The heart of the gay-rights revolution he authored, grounded in liberty and dignity rather than narrow doctrine.

Hamdi v. Rumsfeld2004

542 U.S. 5078–1
Due Process

O'Connor wrote the plurality opinion. A U.S. citizen detained as an enemy combatant is entitled to due process — notice and a meaningful chance to contest the detention. 'A state of war is not a blank check.'

A landmark check on executive power in the war on terror, insisting on the courts' role even in wartime.

First Amendment

Souter wrote the 5–4 majority. Courthouse Ten Commandments displays with a predominantly religious purpose violate the Establishment Clause.

The neutrality principle stated at full strength — decided the same day the Texas monument survived in Van Orden.

The Roberts Court

2005– · 28 cases
Civil Rights

Ginsburg read her dissent aloud from the bench and called on Congress to act. (Dissenting) The majority's cramped reading of the deadline for pay-discrimination claims ignores how such discrimination actually works.

Congress responded with the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009 — a dissent that directly rewrote the law.

Civil Rights

Breyer wrote the seventy-seven-page principal dissent, reading it from the bench. Voluntary race-conscious school-assignment plans in Seattle and Louisville were struck down.

'It is not often in the law that so few have so quickly changed so much' — his most impassioned moment on the bench.

District of Columbia v. Heller2008

554 U.S. 5705–4
Criminal Procedure2 justices

Stevens wrote the principal dissent, answering Scalia's (§103) originalist majority on its own terms. (Dissenting) The Second Amendment protects a right tied to militia service, not an individual right to possess firearms for private purposes.

The sharpest confrontation of interpretive methods in modern constitutional law — two readings of the same words reaching opposite results.

Scalia wrote for the Court, in an exhaustive originalist opinion. The Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep a handgun in the home for self-defense, unconnected to militia service.

The foundational modern gun-rights decision and the fullest demonstration of Scalia's originalist method.

Citizens United v. FEC2010

558 U.S. 3105–4
First Amendment

Kennedy wrote for the Court. The First Amendment bars the government from restricting independent political spending by corporations and unions.

Transformed American campaign finance and remains among the most debated decisions of the era — the swing vote at its most conservative.

McDonald v. City of Chicago2010

561 U.S. 7425–4
Criminal Procedure2 justices

Thomas concurred alone on the Privileges or Immunities ground. (Concurring) The Second Amendment binds the states — and the right should rest on the Fourteenth Amendment's long-neglected Privileges or Immunities Clause.

A characteristic Thomas opinion, urging the Court to return to constitutional first principles the majority preferred to avoid.

Alito wrote the plurality opinion. The Second Amendment applies to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause.

Carried Heller (§103) to the states, a foundational piece of the modern gun-rights architecture later extended in Bruen (§106).

Federalism

Roberts broke with the other conservatives to write the controlling opinion, saving the ACA. The Affordable Care Act's individual mandate exceeds Congress's commerce power but is valid as an exercise of the taxing power.

The defining act of his institutionalism — and, to critics, of result-driven reasoning.

Shelby County v. Holder2013

570 U.S. 5295–4
Civil Rights2 justices

Ginsburg dissented from Chief Justice Roberts's (§109) majority. (Dissenting) Gutting the Voting Rights Act's coverage formula is like 'throwing away your umbrella in a rainstorm because you are not getting wet.'

Her most famous dissent, warning of the voting restrictions that would follow, and a founding text of the 'Notorious RBG' phenomenon.

Roberts wrote for the Court. The Voting Rights Act's coverage formula for subjecting certain states to federal preclearance is unconstitutional because it rests on decades-old data.

Freed covered jurisdictions from federal oversight and reshaped American election law; Ginsburg's (§107) dissent called it 'throwing away your umbrella in a rainstorm.'

Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores2014

573 U.S. 6825–4
First Amendment

Alito wrote for the Court. Closely held for-profit corporations with religious objections may opt out of the contraceptive-coverage requirement under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.

A landmark of the modern religious-liberty expansion, extending conscience protections to businesses.

Schuette v. BAMN2014

572 U.S. 2916–2
Civil Rights

Sotomayor dissented from the bench. (Dissenting) 'The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to speak openly and candidly on the subject of race' — not to forbid its consideration.

Her direct answer to Chief Justice Roberts's (§109) colorblind formula, framing the argument the Court returned to in 2023.

Glossip v. Gross2015

576 U.S. 8635–4
Criminal Procedure

Breyer dissented, joined by Ginsburg (§107), calling for full briefing on the death penalty's constitutionality. Oklahoma's lethal-injection protocol was upheld, 5–4.

'I believe it highly likely that the death penalty violates the Eighth Amendment' — the modern abolition argument, stated from the bench.

Obergefell v. Hodges2015

576 U.S. 6445–4
Due Process

Kennedy wrote for a five-to-four Court. The Constitution guarantees same-sex couples the right to marry nationwide.

The culmination of a twenty-year arc, and one of the most consequential civil-rights rulings of the century.

Utah v. Strieff2016

579 U.S. 2325–3
Criminal Procedure

Sotomayor dissented, in a passage that broke from the record into direct address. (Dissenting) Admitting evidence from an unlawful police stop because officers later found an outstanding warrant licenses exactly the arbitrary stops that fall hardest on communities of color.

Her most celebrated dissent, a landmark of the modern debate over policing and dignity.

Privacy

Breyer wrote the 5–3 majority. Texas's admitting-privileges and surgical-center requirements imposed an undue burden and were struck down.

Undue-burden review with teeth — benefits weighed against burdens, evidence against assertion.

Cooper v. Harris2017

581 U.S. 285

Kagan wrote for the Court. North Carolina unconstitutionally used race to draw two congressional districts.

A significant racial-gerrymandering precedent and a display of the craft beneath her reputation — building a cross-ideological majority on technical terrain.

Roberts wrote the controlling opinion, joining the liberals on the decisive point. The administration's stated reason for adding a citizenship question to the census 'appears to have been contrived' and cannot stand on this record.

A rare judicial check on executive rationale, and a clear example of Roberts's institutional caution.

Flowers v. Mississippi2019

588 U.S. 284

Kavanaugh wrote for the Court. A prosecutor's repeated exclusion of Black jurors across six trials of the same defendant violated the Constitution.

A notable early majority, applying the rule against racial discrimination in jury selection.

Rucho v. Common Cause2019

588 U.S. 684

Kagan wrote the dissent. (Dissenting) Partisan gerrymandering claims are justiciable and demand a remedy; 'for the first time in this Nation's history, the majority declares that it can do nothing.'

Her signature dissent, a passionate warning that the Court was leaving a proven constitutional wrong without remedy.

Neil M. Gorsuch§1136–3

Gorsuch wrote the majority opinion. Title VII's prohibition on discrimination "because of sex" protects gay and transgender employees.

Textualism yielding a result that surprised textualism's political patrons — the clearest demonstration that Gorsuch follows the words, not the coalition.

Neil M. Gorsuch§1135–4

Gorsuch wrote the majority, joined by the four liberals. The Creek Nation's reservation in eastern Oklahoma was never disestablished by Congress and remains Indian Country for federal criminal jurisdiction.

"On the far end of the Trail of Tears was a promise." If Congress wants to take something enormous away from a sovereign people, it must say so clearly — the size of the consequence does not loosen the clarity required of the text.

Ramos v. Louisiana2020

590 U.S. 83

Kavanaugh concurred, setting out a framework for stare decisis. (Concurring) A criminal conviction requires a unanimous jury; a precedent should be overruled only after weighing how wrong it was, the reliance it created, and the consequences of keeping it.

His most substantial writing on when the Court should overrule precedent — a question at the heart of the modern Court.

4 justices

Thomas joined the majority ending the right to abortion and wrote separately urging a broader reexamination. (Concurring) The Court should reconsider its substantive-due-process precedents, including those on contraception and same-sex marriage.

A signal of how far Thomas would carry the logic of Dobbs — the boldest statement of his willingness to revisit settled precedent.

Alito wrote for the Court. The Constitution confers no right to abortion; Roe was 'egregiously wrong from the start,' and the question returns to the states.

The most consequential decision of the twenty-first century so far — the culmination of a fifty-year campaign to overturn Roe.

Kavanaugh joined the majority overruling Roe and wrote separately to stress limits. (Concurring) The Constitution is 'neutral' on abortion; the decision does not permit barring interstate travel for the procedure and does not, in his view, threaten other precedents.

A window into the reassurance-seeking conservatism that makes Kavanaugh so often the pivotal vote.

Barrett — whose confirmation gave the majority its sixth vote — joined Alito's (§110) opinion for the Court. The Constitution confers no right to abortion; Roe and Casey are overruled.

The decision her appointment made possible, and the clearest measure of how a single seat reshaped the Court.

Thomas wrote for the Court. Gun regulations are constitutional only if consistent with the nation's historical tradition of firearm regulation; New York's restrictive licensing scheme fails that test.

Remade Second Amendment litigation nationwide and marked the arrival of Thomas's long-held method at the center of the law.

West Virginia v. EPA2022

597 U.S. 697

Kagan wrote the dissent. (Dissenting) The 'major questions doctrine' wrongly strips agencies of authority Congress gave them, making the Court 'the decision-maker on climate policy.'

The leading liberal defense of the administrative state against the conservative Court's assault on agency power.

Allen v. Milligan2023

599 U.S. 15–4
Civil Rights

Jackson joined the majority and wrote a concurrence grounding the Voting Rights Act in the Fourteenth Amendment's original purpose. Alabama's congressional map likely violates the Voting Rights Act by diluting Black voting strength.

A surprising liberal victory preserving a core tool of the Voting Rights Act; Jackson's concurrence turned the originalist method toward racial justice.

Civil Rights2 justices

Barrett joined the majority and wrote a concurrence on the limits of history in equal-protection analysis. Race-conscious admissions programs violate the Equal Protection Clause.

Ended forty-five years of affirmative action in university admissions, a decision the conservative majority she completed made possible.

Jackson wrote a solo dissent in her first term. (Dissenting) Ignoring race does not undo its measurable, entrenched effects; 'deeming race irrelevant in law does not make it so in life.'

Announced her as a major dissenting voice and framed the historical case against colorblind constitutionalism.

Trump v. United States2024

603 U.S. 593
2 justices

Sotomayor wrote the principal dissent. (Dissenting) Granting former presidents broad immunity for official acts makes the president 'a king above the law.' 'With fear for our democracy, I dissent.'

Her gravest dissent, in the era's central dispute over presidential power and the rule of law.

Jackson wrote a separate dissent. (Dissenting) The majority creates a 'law-free zone' around the presidency, exempting the most powerful official from the accountability that governs everyone else.

A distinct structural warning about placing anyone beyond the reach of the criminal law.

Vidal v. Elster2024

602 U.S. 2869–0 unanimous
First Amendment

Barrett pressed her own colleagues on method. (Concurring in part) History and tradition can inform but should not mechanically decide a constitutional question; courts also need workable principles.

Evidence of a justice thinking hard about how originalism should actually operate — willing to challenge Thomas (§106) and the majority on it.

Neil M. Gorsuch§1136–3

Roberts wrote the majority; Gorsuch's 25-page concurrence traced delegated-power doctrine from English corporate charters (Kirk v. Nowill, 1786) through 19th-century railroad commissions — and chided Barrett's concurrence for intellectual imprecision. IEEPA does not authorize the President to impose tariffs.

A landmark separation-of-powers ruling against the defining policy of the president who appointed him. The concurrence argues the major questions doctrine is not a judicial invention but a restoration of principles the common law always applied to extraordinary delegations — Article I's last defense against executive accumulation.

Method, and its limits

This set is not a canon. Nobody sat down to choose the most important Supreme Court decisions. Each entry was written as part of a justice’s profile, answering a narrower question — which two to four cases explain this career? — and the collection is what fell out. That is a real limit and also the most interesting thing about it: a canon assembled that way contains Elkison v. Deliesseline and a circuit-court treason trial from the Whiskey Rebellion, because they are what William Johnson and William Paterson are remembered for.

Cases are identified by citation, not by name. Two justices can call the same decision different things — Strong’s “Knox v. Lee (Legal Tender Cases)” is Clifford’s “Knox v. Lee” — and two decisions can share a name, as the 1792 injunction and the 1794 jury trial in Georgia v. Brailsford do. The U.S. Reports citation settles both, and 252 of the 265 cases have one. The rest are circuit-riding opinions, state decisions and pre-Court items, grouped by name.

Vote splits and issue areas come from the Supreme Court Database, matched on citation, and are shown for the 240 cases it covers. The issue-area labels are the database’s, not ours. The remaining 25 — circuit opinions, state cases, orders — carry none, which is not a gap in the case so much as in what the database was built to hold.

Every link was verified against its source’s own metadata, not merely checked for a response. That distinction matters more than it sounds: Library of Congress item ids are built from volume and page, but when two cases begin on the same page the Library disambiguates with a letter suffix — and the unsuffixed id then loads a real, different case with a perfectly healthy response. Three landmarks here were wrong that way, Dred Scott among them, and no link checker would have found them.

Generated from the profiles rather than maintained separately, so the two cannot disagree: the build refuses to run if two justices give one case different years or link it in different places. Sources are the Library of Congress’s United States Reports, Justia, the Federal Judicial Center, Cornell’s Legal Information Institute, Founders Online, the Massachusetts Historical Society, the New York State Law Reporting Bureau and govinfo.

Questions

What are the most important Supreme Court decisions?

This page is one answer to that, assembled from the other direction. Rather than ranking cases, it collects the 331 decisions that the justices' own biographies could not be written without — 265 distinct cases across 1782 to 2026, every one attached to the justice whose career it defined, with what the Court held, what that justice did in it, and why it still matters.

Which Supreme Court case involved the most notable justices?

Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857). It appears on 9 of the 116 justice profiles on this site — more than any other decision — because every member of that Court wrote separately or was defined by it. Taney wrote the opinion of the Court; Curtis and McLean dissented and Curtis resigned within the year; Nelson would have decided the case narrowly and avoided the question entirely; Campbell reached the same result on different ground. The nine accounts on this page were written independently, for nine different justices.

Where can I read Supreme Court opinions for free?

Every one of the 331 decisions here links to a free full text — 88 percent of them to the Library of Congress's scans of the United States Reports, the rest to Justia, the Federal Judicial Center, Cornell's Legal Information Institute, the National Archives and state reporters. Nothing on this page sits behind a paywall.

How were these cases chosen?

They were not chosen as a list. Each was picked while writing a particular justice, as one of the two to four decisions that account for why that justice is remembered — so the set is the Court's history seen through 116 careers rather than through a modern sense of which cases are important. That is why it contains Elkison v. Deliesseline and the Whiskey Rebellion treason trials alongside Marbury and Brown.

Each case links to its free full text; each justice to their own profile, where the decision sits back in the story it came from. The Courts themselves are compared at Every Court, Left to Right.