William O. Douglas

The longest-serving justice in Court history (36 years) — a fierce individualist and outdoorsman whose opinions on privacy and free speech remain landmarks, as did his turbulent personal life.

Associate Justice1939–1975Appointed by F. RooseveltJustice #79
Born October 16, 1898 · Maine Township, MN
Died January 19, 1980 · Washington, D.C.
Buried Arlington National Cemetery, Arlington, VA
College Whitman College, 1920
Law Columbia Law School, 1925
Rode the rails east to law school with pennies in his pocket

Path to the Supreme Court

William Orville Douglas was born in Maine in 1898, grew up poor in Washington State, and — after a bout of illness and a hardscrabble youth that made him a lifelong outdoorsman — became a brilliant Yale law professor and the crusading chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Franklin Roosevelt named him to the Court in 1939 at age forty. He would serve thirty-six years and seven months — the longest tenure in the Court's history — a restless, controversial champion of individual liberty and the environment.

On the Supreme Court

Douglas was the Court's most absolute defender of individual rights and civil liberties, impatient with doctrine and eager to reach results that protected the individual against the state. He wrote Griswold v. Connecticut, finding a constitutional 'right to privacy' in the 'penumbras' of the Bill of Rights — the foundation on which Roe v. Wade (§98) would later be built. He had earlier written Skinner v. Oklahoma, striking down the forced sterilization of criminals as a violation of a fundamental right. A pioneering environmentalist, he argued in his Sierra Club v. Morton dissent that natural objects should have legal standing to sue. Surviving an impeachment attempt led by Gerald Ford, he served until a stroke forced his retirement in 1975.

The Voting Record

How Douglas voted in the 4,939 cases the Supreme Court Database records from the 1938 term through the 1975 term, using that database’s classification of each vote as liberal or conservative. The gold tick on each bar is the rate for the other justices sitting on those same cases.

Liberal votes
76.3%
Contemporaries 58.5% — 17.8 points more liberal
Dissent rate
25.1%
Out of the majority in about 25 of every 100 cases; the rest of the bench, 16
Rank
1st
Most to least liberal since 1946, of the 33 justices with a long enough record to rank. Ranked on the 1946–1975 portion (78.8%), not the whole tenure shown above.
Criminal Procedure82.6%
870 cases · contemporaries 53.7% · 28.9 pts more liberal
Civil Rights87.8%
633 cases · contemporaries 65.1% · 22.7 pts more liberal
First Amendment93.4%
362 cases · contemporaries 59.9% · 33.5 pts more liberal
Due Process74.8%
147 cases · contemporaries 64.5% · 10.3 pts more liberal
Unions68.0%
300 cases · contemporaries 60.6% · 7.4 pts more liberal
Economic Activity79.7%
1,182 cases · contemporaries 63.9% · 15.8 pts more liberal
Judicial Power58.1%
676 cases · contemporaries 39.0% · 19.1 pts more liberal
Federalism71.4%
175 cases · contemporaries 60.8% · 10.6 pts more liberal
Federal Taxation56.3%
350 cases · contemporaries 72.4% · 16.1 pts less liberal

Across the whole career Douglas voted with Murphy more than with anyone else — the same side of the judgment in 73.1% of their 647 divided cases — and with Rehnquist least, at 12.7%. See the matrices →Compared against the 24 colleagues Douglas shared at least 300 divided cases with.

And Douglas ended 13.7 points more liberal relative to those colleagues than at the start of the modern record in 1946 — the fifth-largest shift of the 27 justices with a long enough record to measure. See who changed →

Coverage · Douglas sat across the database’s 1946 join, so these figures pool its legacy and modern releases to cover the whole tenure — but the rank is computed on the 1946-onward record alone, because the justices ranked against have no record before then.

Source · The Supreme Court Database (Spaeth, Epstein, Nelson, Martin, et al.) · how these figures are made

Key Decisions

Griswold v. Connecticut

1965

Holding · The Constitution protects a right to marital privacy, found in the 'penumbras' and 'emanations' of the Bill of Rights; a state may not ban contraceptives for married couples.

Role · Douglas wrote for the Court.

Established the constitutional right to privacy — the doctrinal foundation of Roe v. Wade and the modern privacy cases.

Read the opinion →

Skinner v. Oklahoma

1942

Holding · A law ordering the sterilization of certain repeat criminals violates equal protection; procreation is 'one of the basic civil rights of man.'

Role · Douglas wrote for the Court.

An early recognition of fundamental rights and heightened scrutiny, and a repudiation of the eugenic thinking of Buck v. Bell.

Read the opinion →

Sierra Club v. Morton

1972

Holding · (Dissenting) Natural objects — valleys, rivers, trees — should have legal standing, through guardians, to sue for their own protection.

Role · Douglas dissented in a landmark of environmental thought.

The most famous argument in American law for the 'rights of nature,' cited worldwide in environmental jurisprudence.

Read the opinion →

Go Deeper

◆ Best Biography

William Orville Douglas is the longest-serving justice in the Court's history — thirty-six years and seven months — and the most flamboyant, restless, and controversial. A hardscrabble boy from Yakima, Washington, who beat childhood polio by hiking the Cascades, he became a Yale law professor, a crusading chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and, at forty, Franklin Roosevelt's 1939 appointee, nearly his running mate. On the bench he was the fierce libertarian who wrote Griswold v. Connecticut and its 'penumbras' of privacy, the environmentalist who argued that trees should have standing to sue, a First Amendment near-absolutist, and a restless adventurer, author, and four-times-married public figure who twice faced impeachment attempts. Bruce Allen Murphy's Wild Bill is the big modern biography. Start there, read Griswold and the Sierra Club dissent, and take the measure of the Court's great individualist.

The Bookshelf

Best Place to Start

The major modern biography, and a bracing, warts-and-all account. Murphy tells the enormous story — the poverty and polio of the Yakima boyhood (some of it, he shows, mythologized by Douglas himself), the meteoric rise through Yale and the SEC, the thirty-six years on the Court, the mountaineering and world travels, the books, the four marriages, and the two impeachment drives. He is admiring of Douglas's civil-liberties and environmental convictions and unsparing about his carelessness, absences, and self-invention. The fullest and most candid life. Random House.

The Earlier Life

The first major biography, written soon after Douglas's death by a respected legal journalist. Simon is warmer toward Douglas than Murphy and closer in time to the world he moved in; he is especially good on the New Deal rise, the SEC years, the near-vice-presidency, and the civil-liberties jurisprudence, and remains a valuable companion to the harder-edged Wild Bill. Read the two together for the legend and the reckoning. Harper & Row.

The Judicial Record
★★★☆☆3 stars

The scholarly counterweight to the biographies' color — Countryman's systematic survey of what Douglas actually did on the bench across thirty-six years, the longest tenure in the Court's history. The book for the jurisprudence behind the legend. Harvard University Press.

Douglas and Black
★★★☆☆3 stars

The dual study of the two great New Deal liberals who remade constitutional law together and then fell out — Douglas the restless individualist beside Hugo Black (§76), the disciplined textualist. The best account of Douglas in the company of his equal. Oxford University Press.

The Environmentalist
Citizen Justice: The Environmental Legacy of William O. Douglas
(2022) by M. Margaret McKeown
★★★☆☆3 stars

A federal judge's study of the conservationist justice — Douglas's decades of activism for wilderness, his famous hikes and protest marches, and the tangled ethics of a sitting justice who lobbied and litigated for the causes he loved. The fullest account of the Douglas who wanted trees to have standing. Potomac Books.

The Autobiography, Part One
Go East, Young Man: The Early Years
(1974) by William O. Douglas
★★★☆☆3 stars

Douglas's own account of the rise — the hardscrabble Yakima boyhood, the bout with polio, Columbia Law, Wall Street, Yale, and the New Deal SEC that carried him to the Court at forty. Vivid, self-mythologizing, and not always reliable, but irresistible. Random House.

The Autobiography, Part Two
★★★☆☆3 stars

The second volume — Douglas on his thirty-six years as a justice, settling scores with colleagues (Frankfurter above all) and recounting the great cases, the impeachment attempts, and the four marriages. Read it with the biographies' skepticism at hand. Random House.

The Naturalist's Testament
Of Men and Mountains
(1950) by William O. Douglas
★★★☆☆3 stars

His best-loved book — a lyrical memoir of the Cascades that made Douglas a hero to the conservation movement and shaped the environmental jurisprudence he would later write from the bench. The source of the Sierra Club dissent's conviction. Harper & Brothers.

The Provocation
Points of Rebellion
(1970) by William O. Douglas
★★★☆☆3 stars

The incendiary little book that nearly got him impeached — Douglas's defense of dissent and the youth revolt of 1969, published as Gerald Ford was building a House case to remove him. First Amendment absolutism as a personal creed. Random House.

The Letters
★★★☆☆3 stars

Selections from the vast private papers — Douglas in correspondence with presidents, colleagues, and admirers, the candid record behind the public performances. Adler & Adler.

The Privacy Case

Douglas's most famous and most argued-about opinion. Striking down Connecticut's ban on contraceptives, he found a constitutional right to privacy in the 'penumbras, formed by emanations' of several guarantees of the Bill of Rights — a phrase mocked and celebrated ever since. Griswold became the doctrinal foundation of Roe v. Wade and the modern privacy cases, and the flashpoint of the enduring fight over whether the Constitution protects rights it does not name. The single most consequential sentence Douglas ever wrote. Free online.

Should Trees Have Standing?

The most famous dissent in American environmental law. When the Court held that the Sierra Club lacked standing to challenge a ski development in a wild valley, Douglas dissented with the argument that natural objects themselves — 'valleys, alpine meadows, rivers, lakes, estuaries' — ought to be able to sue in their own name, through human guardians. Inspired by Christopher Stone's essay of that year, it launched a whole field of environmental legal theory and remains the touchstone for the 'rights of nature' movement. Vintage Douglas — visionary, unorthodox, alone. Free online.

The Conservationist

The only scholarly monograph on Douglas's second identity — the justice as conservation crusader, from the C&O Canal protest hike to the 'trees have standing' dissent. McKeown's Citizen Justice on this shelf tells the story; Sowards weighs it as history. Oregon State University Press.

The Anthology
Nature's Justice: Writings of William O. Douglas
(2000) by James M. O'Fallon, ed.

The standard one-volume Douglas reader — judicial opinions and mountain prose side by side, which is the only honest way to present him. The anthology counterpart to Urofsky's edition of the letters. Oregon State University Press.

The Reference Entry

The standard modern biographical encyclopedia of the Court: a signed essay on each of the 110 justices from Jay to Alito, alphabetically arranged, by a named scholar or journalist. Length tracks reputation — two pages for Thomas Johnson, three for Woods, eleven for Holmes — which is itself a rough map of who the literature has bothered with. It is not a substitute for a biography, and for the justices who have never had one it is often the most careful short account in print. Borrow it free at the Internet Archive.

The Reference Entry
The Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States
(2nd ed., 2005) by Hall, Kermit L., et al., eds.

The one-volume reference on the Court: more than a thousand signed entries on cases, doctrines, institutions and the justices, current to 2005. Cases and people share one alphabet, so a citation can be followed without changing volumes, and the biographical entries are short, written by specialists, and better than a longer sketch at carrying the historiography — what the argument about a justice currently is. Borrow it free at the Internet Archive.

The Reading Path

A researched route through the literature — in order.

  1. 1.
    Murphy, Wild Billfor the whole outsized life, myths and all
  2. 2.
    Griswold v. Connecticutfor the 'penumbras' and the right to privacy
  3. 3.
    Sierra Club v. Morton dissentfor the idea that nature itself might sue
  4. 4.
    Simon, Independent Journeyfor the warmer, closer-in-time account
  5. 5.
    Go East, Young Man / The Court Yearsfor Douglas telling his own outsized story

Where the Papers Are Kept

Library of Congress

The William O. Douglas papers at the Library of Congress are enormous — decades of correspondence, draft opinions, manuscripts of his many books, and personal files that document one of the most public and prolific lives in the Court's history. A vast and much-mined collection. Visit →

Ideas for Further Research

  • The penumbra problem. Douglas found the right to privacy in 'penumbras, formed by emanations' from the Bill of Rights — a method attacked from the start as invented and defended as the only honest way to protect liberties the framers did not foresee. Trace the line from Griswold through Roe and Casey to Dobbs (2022), and ask whether unenumerated rights can rest on Douglas's reasoning or need a firmer foundation.
  • Should trees have standing? Douglas's Sierra Club dissent turned a law-review provocation into a serious constitutional idea and helped found environmental law's 'rights of nature.' Follow the idea from 1972 to the modern statutes and foreign constitutions that grant rivers and ecosystems legal personhood, and ask whether Douglas was a crank or a prophet — or both.
  • The cost of the legend. Douglas served longer than anyone, wrote more, traveled more, and married more than any justice — and was accused of absenteeism, carelessness, and self-mythology. Weigh the record against the reputation: did his restless public life enlarge the Court's conception of liberty, or did the legend of 'Wild Bill' come at the expense of the disciplined judging his causes deserved? Seat lineage: Brandeis §67DouglasStevens §101.

This Seat on the Court