Path to the Supreme Court
On July 20, 1965, six days after Adlai Stevenson died in a London street, Lyndon Johnson announced his replacement at the United Nations: 'To assume these responsibilities now I have called upon a member of the Supreme Court of the United States, and a former member of the Cabinet': Justice Arthur Goldberg. It was fitting, the President said, 'that we should ask a member of our highest court to relinquish that office to speak for America before the nations of the world.' The justice, standing beside him, did not pretend to be glad. 'I shall not,' he said, 'conceal the pain with which I leave the Court after 3 years of service. It has been the richest and most satisfying period of my career.' Twenty-one years later he gave a wire service his own verdict on the trade: 'I accomplished my objective, too late.' No justice in this program left the bench in his prime for another office; this chapter is about the man who did, and about the hurry that had carried him there in the first place.
Arthur Joseph Goldberg was born on Chicago's West Side on August 8, 1908, the youngest of a large immigrant family whose exact size varies with the telling, from seven children to eleven. His father, Joseph, had been a town clerk in Ukraine before the pogroms sent him to America, where he peddled produce from a wagon; he died when Arthur was eight. The boy worked from then on, at a fish market, selling shoes, hawking at Wrigley Field, and clerking in a library, which he liked best, and he finished high school at sixteen. Crane Junior College led to Northwestern, where he took his law degree in 1930 first in his class and editor-in-chief of the law review, and where the hurry first shows in the record: by the Court's own later account, 'by special dispensation, Arthur Goldberg sat for the Illinois bar examination before he reached the age of 21.' He married Dorothy Kurgans, a painter, in 1931; they had a daughter and a son.
A few years at a Chicago firm that hired Jewish lawyers, then his own practice from 1933, and then the strike that made him. In 1938 the Chicago Newspaper Guild struck the Hearst paper, and Goldberg represented the pickets through more than a year of litigation, largely unpaid, winning an injunction against the publisher and pressing contempt when it was ignored. Labor had found its lawyer. The war interrupted: he served under William Donovan as chief of the Labor Division of the Office of Strategic Services, running the agency's contacts with the European labor underground, and came out a major. In 1948 he became general counsel to both the Congress of Industrial Organizations and the United Steelworkers, and for the next thirteen years he was the movement's chief lawyer and much of its strategy: the legal case for expelling the communist-led unions in 1949 and 1950, a central hand in the 1955 merger that made the AFL-CIO (the Court's memorial would say he 'played a major role'), and the union's counsel through the 116-day steel strike of 1959. He wrote the merger's story himself in AFL-CIO: Labor United (1956).
John Kennedy made him Secretary of Labor in January 1961, and the department became a mediation service run by its Secretary. When the flight engineers walked out of seven airlines that March he negotiated a ninety-day truce; when the Metropolitan Opera and its orchestra deadlocked that August, both sides asked him to arbitrate, and the President's letter of commendation named him as the arbitrator 'who will serve at your and my request.' In April 1962, when U.S. Steel raised prices days after Goldberg had steered the union to a modest settlement, he was at the center of the White House counterattack; by TIME's contemporaneous account the President's statement denouncing the increase 'had been drafted by Goldberg, rewritten by Aide Ted Sorensen and changed in the last minutes by Kennedy himself.' Then Felix Frankfurter (§78), felled by a stroke, retired on August 28, 1962, and the next day Kennedy named his Secretary of Labor to the seat, a man who would bring 'a wealth of experience gained from the active practice of law for over 30 years.' The Senate confirmed him by voice vote on September 25, and he took the oaths on October 1, 1962. The seat had passed from Cardozo (§75) to Frankfurter and now to Goldberg, and would pass to Abe Fortas (§95); a succession the press would come to call the Jewish seat.
On the Supreme Court
He sat three terms, and they were the terms in which the Warren Court found its fifth vote. His first major opinion carried a sentence America would keep: 'The powers of Congress to require military service for the common defense are broad and far-reaching,' he wrote in Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez (1963), 'for while the Constitution protects against invasions of individual rights, it is not a suicide pact.' The phrase is usually credited to Robert Jackson (§82), whose 1949 dissent warned against converting the Bill of Rights 'into a suicide pact'; the version everyone now quotes is Goldberg's. In Escobedo v. Illinois (1964) he moved the right to counsel back to the police station: 'when the process shifts from investigatory to accusatory,' the accused 'must be permitted to consult with his lawyer,' because 'a system of criminal law enforcement which comes to depend on the "confession" will, in the long run, be less reliable and more subject to abuses than a system which depends on extrinsic evidence independently secured through skillful investigation.' In Aptheker v. Secretary of State (1964) he struck the passport ban on Communist Party members, since the right to travel 'is a part of the "liberty" of which the citizen cannot be deprived without due process of law.' In Murphy v. Waterfront Commission (1964) he gave the privilege against self-incrimination its most quoted rationale, 'our unwillingness to subject those suspected of crime to the cruel trilemma of self-accusation, perjury or contempt.' In Cox v. Louisiana (1965) he reversed a breach-of-peace conviction for a civil-rights march. And in Griswold v. Connecticut (1965), his last term, he wrote the concurrence that put the Ninth Amendment back into the conversation: its 'language and history' showed 'that the Framers of the Constitution believed that there are additional fundamental rights, protected from governmental infringement, which exist alongside those fundamental rights specifically mentioned in the first eight constitutional amendments.'
The opinion that outlasted his tenure was one he filed with two colleagues against a denial of review. In Rudolph v. Alabama (1963), a rape case, Goldberg, joined by William O. Douglas (§79) and William Brennan (§90), asked whether the Eighth Amendment permitted 'the imposition of the death penalty on a convicted rapist who has neither taken nor endangered human life,' measured against the 'evolving standards of decency that mark the progress of a maturing society' that Earl Warren (§88) had written into the law in 1958. Behind the short dissent lay a longer memorandum to the Conference on the death penalty as a whole, drafted with his clerk Alan Dershowitz; by the accounts of the campaign's historians, the Chief Justice asked him not to press it, the narrower dissent went out instead, and the memorandum's argument found its way to the lawyers of the Legal Defense Fund, who built from it the litigation that reached Furman v. Georgia nine years later. He returned to the subject himself in 1987, in an essay titled 'Death and the Supreme Court.'
The Supreme Court Database holds him at the edge of its instruments. Across 440 coded votes his liberal share was 76.1 percent against a docket baseline of 69.0, the Warren Court at its height, for a gap of 7.1 points; he dissented in 9.6 percent of cases against colleagues who dissented at 16.3 on the same ones. Three terms fall below the floor for the site's agreement matrices and below the floor for its drift series; the record is too short for either.
Then Stevenson died, and Johnson, who had wanted Fortas on the Court from the start, needed a seat. By his biographer's account the President raised the United Nations with Goldberg at the White House and pressed it aboard the plane to Stevenson's funeral, with a promise, never kept, to reappoint him at the next vacancy. Goldberg said yes for the reason he gave for the rest of his life: he believed he could turn the President on Vietnam. He was sworn in at the United Nations on July 26, 1965, calling the work 'the greatest adventure of man's history.' The years there were spent on a war he could not end and on a peace he helped draft: in November 1967 he was the American hand on Security Council Resolution 242, whose omitted definite article, withdrawal from 'territories' rather than 'the territories,' he later defended as deliberate. Johnson announced on the last day of March 1968 that he would not run again; Goldberg resigned four weeks later, citing personal reasons, and the frustration over the war is the consensus of everyone who has written about it. 'I accomplished my objective,' Goldberg told UPI in 1986, 'too late.'
He was fifty-nine, and the rest was long. In 1970 he ran for governor of New York as the Democratic nominee and lost to Nelson Rockefeller by twelve points; by his biographer's account, asked on the trail whether he wished he were still on the Court, he answered that so did he, sometimes. He argued Curt Flood's antitrust case against baseball in 1972 and lost that too, to an opinion by Harry Blackmun (§98). Jimmy Carter made him ambassador-at-large to the Belgrade human-rights conference of 1977 and 1978. He taught, wrote, and practiced. Dorothy died in February 1988, and he died at home in Washington on January 19, 1990, at eighty-one, and was buried at Arlington. When the Court sat in his memory that October, Chief Justice Rehnquist (§100), who had first met him only in 1971, said what the record says: of the several public roles Goldberg held, 'he liked that of Associate Justice most of all.' Stephen Breyer (§108), who clerked for him in his last term, remembered a man 'happy on the Court; indeed he was in his element.' He had sat for the bar before he was twenty-one, joined the Cabinet at fifty-two, and reached the Court at fifty-four; the hurry that had carried him so far carried him off it at fifty-six. Of all the offices he held in a hurry, the one he left in a hurry was the one he loved.
The Voting Record
How Goldberg voted in the 452 cases the Supreme Court Database records from the 1962 term through the 1964 term, using that database’s classification of each vote as liberal or conservative. The gold tick on each bar is the rate for the other justices sitting on those same cases.
Where Goldberg sat among the colleagues on the same bench — and whether that Court divided clearly enough for the question to have an answer — is laid out Court by Court. See this Court →
Source · The Supreme Court Database (Spaeth, Epstein, Nelson, Martin, et al.) · how these figures are made
Key Decisions
Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez
1963Holding · Automatically stripping citizenship for draft evasion is punishment that requires a criminal trial.
Role · Goldberg wrote the majority.
'While the Constitution protects against invasions of individual rights, it is not a suicide pact' — the balance-in-crisis line quoted ever since.
Read the opinion →Escobedo v. Illinois
1964Holding · Once an investigation focuses on a suspect in custody, denial of counsel during interrogation violates the Sixth Amendment.
Role · Goldberg wrote the 5–4 majority.
The direct precursor of Miranda — the interrogation room's door opened to lawyers.
Read the opinion →Griswold v. Connecticut
1965Holding · Connecticut's ban on contraceptives for married couples was unconstitutional.
Role · Goldberg concurred, joined by Warren (§88) and Brennan (§90), grounding unenumerated rights partly in the Ninth Amendment.
The Ninth Amendment's great modern moment — a text 'forgotten' until Goldberg reread it.
Read the opinion →Go Deeper
Arthur Joseph Goldberg is the labor lawyer who reached the Court and then let it go. The son of Russian-Jewish immigrants in Chicago, he became the nation's foremost labor attorney — architect of the AFL–CIO merger and general counsel to the Steelworkers — and John F. Kennedy's secretary of labor before his 1962 appointment to the seat Felix Frankfurter (§78) had held, the Court's traditional 'Jewish seat.' In three brief years he moved the Court leftward as a reliable liberal vote, writing Escobedo v. Illinois, extending the right to counsel into the police interrogation room, and a landmark concurrence in Griswold v. Connecticut that grounded the right of privacy in the long-neglected Ninth Amendment. Then, in 1965, Lyndon Johnson flattered and maneuvered him into resigning to become ambassador to the United Nations — a decision Goldberg came bitterly to regret. David Stebenne's biography is the standard life. Start there, read Escobedo and the Griswold concurrence, and consider the justice who gave up the robe.
The Bookshelf
The definitive biography, and a rich account of twentieth-century American liberalism through one career. Stebenne traces Goldberg from immigrant Chicago through the labor movement he helped build, the Kennedy cabinet, the Supreme Court, and the frustrating years at the United Nations trying to end the Vietnam War. He is especially good on the labor lawyer's vision of an activist state and on the fateful 1965 decision to leave the Court — the misjudgment that ended a promising judicial career after three years. The essential life. Oxford University Press.
Goldberg's most important opinion, and a direct forerunner of Miranda. Holding that a suspect denied the lawyer he had asked for during police interrogation was deprived of his Sixth Amendment right to counsel, he wrote that a system relying on confessions extracted in the back room is less reliable and less civilized than one that respects the accused's rights. Two years later Miranda v. Arizona would build on Escobedo to require the famous warnings. A cornerstone of the Warren Court's criminal-procedure revolution, from its short-serving liberal. Free online.
Goldberg's most enduring contribution to constitutional theory. Concurring in the decision striking Connecticut's contraception ban, he declined to rest the right of privacy on Douglas's (§79) 'penumbras' and instead revived the long-dormant Ninth Amendment — 'The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people' — as textual warrant for rights the framers did not list. His concurrence put the Ninth Amendment back into serious constitutional argument, where it has figured in the privacy and liberty debates ever since. Free online.
The reliable short account — the immigrant Chicago boyhood, the great labor-law career, the Kennedy cabinet, the three years on the Court, and the regretted departure for the United Nations — in a few well-sourced pages with a portrait. Good on the 'Jewish seat' Goldberg inherited from Frankfurter (§78) and passed to Fortas (§95). The best compact, citable life to set beside Stebenne. CQ Press for the SCHS.
Goldberg's public papers — labor lawyer, Secretary of Labor, justice, UN ambassador — edited, remarkably, by Daniel Patrick Moynihan. The primary source for the man LBJ talked off the Court, published the year after he left it. Harper & Row.
Goldberg's Rosenthal Lectures — the ex-justice's own defense of the Warren Court he served, including the argument against the death penalty he had pressed from the bench in Rudolph v. Alabama. His fullest statement of what those three years meant. Northwestern University Press.
The standard modern biographical encyclopedia of the Court: a signed essay on each of the 110 justices from Jay to Alito, alphabetically arranged, by a named scholar or journalist. Length tracks reputation — two pages for Thomas Johnson, three for Woods, eleven for Holmes — which is itself a rough map of who the literature has bothered with. It is not a substitute for a biography, and for the justices who have never had one it is often the most careful short account in print. Borrow it free at the Internet Archive.
The one-volume reference on the Court: more than a thousand signed entries on cases, doctrines, institutions and the justices, current to 2005. Cases and people share one alphabet, so a citation can be followed without changing volumes, and the biographical entries are short, written by specialists, and better than a longer sketch at carrying the historiography — what the argument about a justice currently is. Borrow it free at the Internet Archive.
The labor years from the Bureau of Labor Statistics' own journal: the 1938 Newspaper Guild strike, the OSS Labor Division, the CIO and the Steelworkers, the 1955 merger, and the Labor Department, by a Penn professor who knew the movement. The best short account of the career before the Court. Free at BLS.
The October 15, 1990 memorial: the Bar's resolution (Northwestern first in his class, the bar 'by special dispensation' before he was twenty-one, the 1955 merger), Solicitor General Starr and Attorney General Thornburgh, and Chief Justice Rehnquist's response, which says that of all his public roles 'he liked that of Associate Justice most of all.' Free at govinfo.
His own account, twenty-four years on, of the 1963 memorandum urging the Court to take up the death penalty, the Rudolph v. Alabama dissent, and what became of the argument after Furman and Gregg, ending with the case that legislatures and governors retain the power to abolish. Free at the Hastings repository.
What the clerk took from the justice: Breyer's 1964-65 year in Goldberg's chambers set against his own later method, with Breyer's recollection of a man 'happy on the Court; indeed he was in his element.' The Goldberg-Breyer thread, from the Breyer side. Free at the Law Review.
The Library's collection, 78,000 items in 296 containers and 120.7 linear feet, of which the Court is one series among many: the finding aid says 'the Supreme Court File represents Goldberg's tenure as an associate justice on the Court from 1962 to 1965,' with a case file of 'draft opinions, memoranda, and notes,' and adds that 'additional Supreme Court files of Goldberg are in the Northwestern University School of Law Library.' Labor, the United Nations and a political campaign file fill the rest. Free at the Library of Congress as a PDF.
The Reading Path
A researched route through the literature — in order.
- 1.Stebenne, Arthur J. Goldberg — for the labor lawyer and the liberalism he embodied
- 2.Escobedo v. Illinois — for the right to counsel that led to Miranda
- 3.Griswold concurrence — for the revival of the Ninth Amendment
- 4.The SCHS Illustrated Biographies — for the capsule life and the regretted resignation
Where the Papers Are Kept
Goldberg's papers are divided chiefly between the Library of Congress and Northwestern University, documenting the labor-law career, the Labor Department, the Court, and the United Nations years. A rich record of a life at the center of American labor and liberalism, and the base for Stebenne's biography. Visit →
Ideas for Further Research
- The justice who gave up the robe. In 1965 Goldberg let Lyndon Johnson talk him off a lifetime seat and into the U.N. ambassadorship — believing, he later said, that he could help end the Vietnam War, and finding instead that he had traded real power for a frustrating errand. Reconstruct the decision and its regret, and use it to ask why a Supreme Court seat became, over the twentieth century, a post almost no one willingly leaves.
- The Ninth Amendment revived. Goldberg's Griswold concurrence rescued the Ninth Amendment from near-total constitutional oblivion and made it an argument for unenumerated rights. Trace the amendment's strange career — ignored for 170 years, revived by Goldberg, invoked and resisted in the privacy and liberty cases since — and ask whether it can bear the interpretive weight he placed on it.
- The Jewish seat. From Brandeis (§67) through Cardozo (§75), Frankfurter (§78), Goldberg, and Fortas (§95), a single seat carried an unofficial tradition of Jewish representation — until it lapsed for a quarter-century after 1969. Trace the history and the politics of the 'Jewish seat,' and ask what such informal representational norms reveal about how the Court's composition has been understood. Seat lineage: Frankfurter §78 → Goldberg → Fortas §95.